Real Freedom
The only true form of freedom, the only ethical form of freedom, is through
self-limitation. It is not the privilege of choosing everything you want in your
life, but rather, choosing what you will give up in your life.
This is not only real freedom, this is the only freedom. Diversions come
and go. Pleasure never lasts. Variety loses its meaning. But you will always be
able to choose what you are willing to sacrifice, what you are willing to give
up.
This sort of self-denial is paradoxically the only thing that expands real
freedom in life. The pain of regular physical exercise ultimately enhances
your physical freedom—your strength, mobility, endurance, and stamina. The
sacrifice of a strong work ethic gives you the freedom to pursue more job
opportunities, to steer your own career trajectory, to earn more money and the
benefits that come with it. The willingness to engage in conflict with others
will free you to talk to anyone, to see if they share your values and beliefs, to
discover what they can add to your life and what you can add to theirs.
You can become freer right now simply by choosing the limitations you
want to impose on yourself. You can choose to wake up earlier each morning,
to block your email until midafternoon each day, to delete social media apps
from your phone. These limitations will free you because they will liberate
your time, attention, and power of choice. They treat your consciousness as an
end in itself.
If you struggle to go to the gym, then rent a locker and leave all your work
clothes there so you have to go each morning. Limit yourself to two to three
social events each week, so you are forced to spend time with the people you
care about most. Write a check to a close friend or family member for three
thousand dollars and tell them that if you ever smoke a cigarette again, they
get to cash it.
14
Ultimately, the most meaningful freedom in your life comes from your
commitments, the things in life for which you have chosen to sacrifice. There
is emotional freedom in my relationship with my wife that I would never be
able to reproduce even if I dated a thousand other women. There is freedom in
my having played guitar for twenty years—a deeply artistic expression—that
I could not get if I just memorized dozens of songs. There is freedom in
having lived in one place for fifty years—an intimacy and familiarity with the
community and culture—that you cannot replicate no matter how much of the
world you’ve seen.
Greater commitment allows for greater depth. A lack of commitment
requires superficiality.
In the last ten years, there has been a trend toward “life hacking.” People
want to learn a language in a month, to visit fifteen countries in a month, to
become a champion martial artist in a week, and they come up with all sorts
of “hacks” to do it. You see it all the time on YouTube and social media these
days: people undertaking ridiculous challenges just to show it can be done.
This “hacking” of life, though, simply amounts to trying to reap the rewards
of commitment without actually making a commitment. It’s another sad form
of fake freedom. It’s empty calories for the soul.
I recently read about a guy who memorized moves from a chess program
to prove he could “master” chess in a month. He didn’t learn anything about
chess, didn’t engage with the strategy, develop a style, learn tactics. Nope, he
approached it like a gigantic homework assignment: memorize the moves,
win once against some highly ranked player, then declare mastery for
yourself.
15
This is not winning anything. This is merely the appearance of winning
something. It is the appearance of commitment and sacrifice without the
commitment and sacrifice. It is the appearance of meaning where there is
none.
Fake freedom puts us on the treadmill toward chasing more, whereas real
freedom is the conscious decision to live with less.
Fake freedom is addictive: no matter how much you have, you always feel
as though it’s not enough. Real freedom is repetitive, predictable, and
sometimes dull.
Fake freedom has diminishing returns: it requires greater and greater
amounts of energy to achieve the same joy and meaning. Real freedom has
increasing returns: it requires less and less energy to achieve the same joy and
meaning.
Fake freedom is seeing the world as an endless series of transactions and
bargains which you feel you’re winning. Real freedom is seeing the world
unconditionally, with the only victory being over your own desires.
Fake freedom requires the world to conform to your will. Real freedom
requires nothing of the world. It is only your will.
Ultimately, the overabundance of diversion and the fake freedom it
produces limits our ability to experience real freedom. The more options we
have, the more variety before us, the more difficult it becomes to choose,
sacrifice, and focus. And we are seeing this conundrum play out across our
culture today.
In 2000, the Harvard political scientist Robert Putnam published his seminal
book Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community.
16
In
it, he documents the decline of civic participation across the United States,
arguing that people are joining and participating less in groups, instead
preferring to do their activities alone, hence the title of the book: More people
bowl today than before, yet bowling leagues are going extinct. People are
bowling alone. Putnam wrote about the United States, but this not merely an
American phenomenon.
17
Throughout the book, Putnam shows that this is not limited to recreational
groups but is affecting everything from labor unions to parent-teacher
associations to Rotary clubs to churches to bridge clubs. This atomization of
society has significant effects, he argues: social trust has declined, with
people becoming more isolated, less politically engaged, and all-around more
paranoid about their neighbors.
18
Loneliness is also a growing issue. Last year, for the first time, a majority
of Americans said they were lonely, and new research is suggesting that we’re
replacing a few high-quality relationships in our lives with a large number of
superficial and temporary relationships.
19
According to Putnam, the social connective tissue in the country is being
destroyed by the overabundance of diversions. He argued that people were
choosing to stay home and watch TV, surf the internet, or play video games
rather than commit themselves to some local organization or group. He also
predicts the situation will likely only get worse.
20
Historically, when Westerners have looked at all the oppressed people
throughout the world, we’ve lamented their lack of fake freedom, their lack of
diversion. People in North Korea can’t read the news or shop for clothes they
like or listen to music that isn’t state sponsored.
But this is not why North Koreans are not free. They lack freedom not
because they are unable to choose their pleasures, but because they are not
allowed to choose their pain. They are not allowed to choose their
commitments freely. They are forced into sacrifices they would not otherwise
want or do not deserve. Pleasure is beside the point—their lack of pleasure is
a mere side effect of their real oppression: their enforced pain.
21
Because, today, in most parts of the world, people are now able to choose
their pleasures. They are able to choose what to read and what games to play
and what to wear. Modern diversions are everywhere. But the tyranny of a
new age is achieved not by depriving people of diversions and commitments.
Today’s tyranny is achieved by flooding people with so much diversion, so
much bullshit information and frivolous distraction, that they are unable to
make smart commitments. It’s Bernays’s prediction come true, just a few
generations later than he expected. It took the breadth and power of the
internet to make his vision of global propaganda campaigns, of governments
and corporations silently steering the desires and wishes of the masses, a
reality.
22
But let’s not give Bernays too much credit. After all, he did seem like kind
of a douche balloon.
Besides, there was a man who saw all this coming way before Bernays, a
man who saw the dangers of fake freedom, who saw the proliferation of
diversions and the myopic effect they would have on people’s values, how too
much pleasure makes everyone childish and selfish and entitled and totally
narcissistic and unbearable on Twitter. This man was far wiser and more
influential than anyone you would ever see on a news channel or a TED Talk
stage or a political soapbox, for that matter. This guy was the OG of political
philosophy. Forget the “Godfather of Soul,” this guy literally invented the
idea of the soul. And he (arguably) saw this whole shitstorm brewing multiple
millennia before anyone else did.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |