431
15
The Evolution of Natural Law in Ireland
Eoin Carolan
15.1. Introduction
From an Irish perspective, the notion of an ‘invisible constitution’ most
obviously calls to mind the controversy over the influence of natural law phi-
losophy on Ireland’s constitutional order. The Constitution of Ireland contains
several provisions which can be plausibly construed as having a natural law
dimension. Quite what these allusions to an external moral code meant for
constitutional practice, however, proved contentious. This partly reflected the
Constitution’s lack of textual clarity on these questions. It can also be traced,
however, to the contestable character and content of this ‘natural law’ itself.
Acknowledged but ambiguous, endorsed but arguably unknowable, natural
law provides perhaps the most high-profile experiment in Ireland with an
‘invisible’ constitutional resource. It serves therefore as the most relevant Irish
source of reflection on this theme.
This chapter is divided into a number of sections. Section
15.2
describes the
history of natural law references in Irish constitutional jurisprudence. This
section sets out the conventional narrative, which is that natural law enjoyed
a period of prominence during the period between the mid-1960s and mid-
1990s before being decisively and completely rejected by the Supreme Court
in its Abortion Information Bill decision in 1995.
1
This heralded the ‘death of
natural law’ within the Irish legal system.
2
The next section of the chapter challenges that narrative in several respects.
It is argued, first of all, that the ‘death of the natural law’ narrative is based on a
series of questionable assumptions about the natural law jurisprudence of the
1
In re Article 26 and the Regulation of Information (Services outside the State for the Termination
of Pregnancies)
Bill 1995 [1995] 1 IR 1 (‘the Abortion Information Bill’ reference).
2
Adrian F. Twomey, ‘The Death of the Natural Law?’ (1995) 13 Irish Law Times 270.
432
Eoin Carolan
Irish courts in the 1960s to 1990s. A careful reading of the case law from this
period confirms that the Supreme Court’s 1995 decision was not necessarily
inconsistent with (at least some of) the judicial determinations that preceded it.
Nor, it is suggested, does it necessarily mean the end of natural law in
Ireland. The second argument advanced in Section
15.3
is that the Supreme
Court continues to draw on natural-law-style reasoning in some of its recent
cases. Specifically, the Supreme Court’s willingness to have regard to values
of dignity, autonomy and justice in certain instances of constitutional adju-
dication bears comparison, in some respects, with the earlier invocations of
natural law. While the terminology and (perhaps) content of these ‘invisible’
norms may have changed, their interpretative potential as extra-textual sources
of constitutional understanding seems broadly similar.
The final section of the chapter considers the implications of this analysis
for the book’s wider interest in ‘invisible’ constitutional values. In particular,
the fact that the Irish courts continue to make use of quasi-moral or normative
concepts that are not clearly enumerated in the text, that are ambiguous in
their content and that may carry with them connotations of inalienability is
argued to suggest either a reluctance or inability to rely on purely textual read-
ings alone. Section
15.4
considers why this might be the case. What the Irish
experience indicates, the chapter tentatively concludes, is that there may be
social and systemic benefits to a degree of opacity in the constitutional order.
15.2. Natural Law and the Constitution of Ireland
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: