(London, 1860), pp. 349-50.
7
The Reading Room in Literature
eBLJ 2019, Article 5
the list of ‘premonitory symptoms’, it was borne in upon me that I had fairly got it.
I sat for a while, frozen with horror; and then, in the listlessness of despair, I again
turned over the pages. I came to typhoid fever – read the symptoms – discovered that
I had typhoid fever, must have had it for months without knowing it – wondered what
else I had got; turned up St. Vitus’s Dance – found, as I expected, that I had that too, –
began to get interested in my case, and determined to sift it to the bottom, and so started
alphabetically – read up ague, and learnt that I was sickening for it, and that the acute
stage would commence in about another fortnight. Bright’s disease, I was relieved to
find, I had only in a modified form, and, so far as that was concerned, I might live for
years. Cholera I had, with severe complications; and diphtheria I seemed to have been
born with. I plodded conscientiously through the twenty-six letters, and the only malady
I could conclude I had not got was housemaid’s knee. […]
I had walked into that reading-room a happy, healthy man. I crawled out a decrepit
wreck.
13
The dreary lives of the hack writers who were such a feature of the life of the Reading
Room in the latter part of the nineteenth century are vividly evoked by George Gissing in the
following extract from his novel
New Grub Street
.
The days darkened. Through November rains and fogs Marian went her usual way to the
Museum, and toiled there among the other toilers. […]
One day at the end of the month she sat with books open before her, but by no effort
could fix her attention upon them. It was gloomy, and one could scarcely see to read; a
taste of fog grew perceptible in the warm, headachy air. Such profound discouragement
possessed her that she could not even maintain the pretence of study; heedless whether
anyone observed her, she let her hands fall and her head droop. She kept asking herself
what was the use and purpose of such a life as she was condemned to lead. When already
there was more good literature in the world than any mortal could cope with in his
lifetime, here she was exhausting herself in the manufacture of printed stuff which no
one even pretended to be more than a commodity for the day’s market. […]
The fog grew thicker; she looked up at the windows beneath the dome and saw they
they were a dusky yellow. Then her eye discerned an official walking along the upper
gallery, and in pursuance of her grotesque humour, her mocking misery, she likened him
to a black, lost soul, doomed to wander in an eternity of vain research along endless
shelves. Or again, the readers who sat here at these radiating lines of desks, what were
they but hapless flies caught in a huge web, its nucleus the great circle of the Catalogue?
Darker, darker. From the towering wall of volumes seemed to emanate visible motes,
intensifying the obscurity; in a moment the book-lined circumference of the room would
be a featureless prison-limit.
But then flashed forth the sputtering whiteness of the electric light, and its ceaseless
hum was henceforth a new source of headache.
14
We now come to the story of Enoch Soames, written by Max Beerbohm. This is an account
of a minor and unsuccessful poet of the 1890s who described himself as a Catholic diabolist,
and wrote books with titles such as
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: