O‘zmu xabarlari Вестник нууз acta nuuz

O„zMU xabarlari Вестник НУУз ACTA NUUz
 
FILOLOGIYA 
1/5 2022 
- 213 - 
the communication and pragmatic analysis will be ensured by 
means of the outcomes proposed by Schmidt , Lakoff, 
Dybenko, Popova.
Analysis and results 
Numerous scholars have identified different types of 
discourses, enlisting, poetic, national, scientific, economic, 
pedagogical, and one of them which is going to be discussed 
in detail further is ―political discourse‖. Nonetheless, 
Krasnyh(1999) describes all listed above as ―Modifications‖ 
not types, adapted in accordance with the sphere in which it 
functions[7]. Before going further, I would like to give brief 
definition to the primary sight. Political discourse is not only 
the text but also a talk of professional politicians or political 
institutions, such as presidents and prime ministers and other 
members of government, parliament or political parties, both 
at the local, national and international levels, includes both the 
speaker and the audience[8]. Discourse includes verbal and 
non-verbal(encyclopedic) means, mental issues, intention of 
communicants, 
moreover, 
the 
communication 
tools. 
According to V.I.Karasik, the basis of classification of 
political discourse is the criterion of orientation. He classifies 
two major types of discourse. Firstly, Personal also called 
personal oriented, a type in which the speaker acts as the 
individual in all affluence of his inner world. Secondly, 
Institutional in other words, status-oriented, in which speaker 
acts as the representative of a certain social status. The 
institutional discourse represents communication within the 
status and role relations. In relation to modern society the 
following types of an institutional discourse are allocated: 
political, 
diplomatic, 
administrative, 
legal, 
military, 
pedagogical, religious, mystical, medical, business, adverti-
sing, sports, scientific, scenic and mass-informational[9]. 
Conjointly there are some inherited features by the way of 
explanation categorizations counted as part of the political 
discourse. The first category of ―The image of the author‖ 
which is important in characterizing both personal-oriented 
and status –oriented discourse. Dependently to the situation of 
the communication, the feature of image of the author is 
branched into two components, to which corresponds the 
objectivity and subjectivity of the concept, they are as follows: 
the author‘s abstraction when his personal charac-
teristics and psychological states have no communicative 
priority; 
the 
author‘s 
personification 
when 
personal 
characteristics of the interlocutor and his psychological state 
considerably influence on communication process.
The second category is ―addressee ability or factor of 
addressee‖ which actually is a representative of two roles, 
from the point of view of creation of a discourse and from a 
position of its understanding is considered to be one of the 
prior categories of a discourse. Corresponding to the 
circumstance in the sphere of policy, the category is closely 
connected with the following concepts: 
communicative leadership (when communicating the 
communicative leader will be the one who regulates the 
process of communication by directing it to the achievement 
of the communicative objects); 
communicative equality (when communicating it is 
possible to speak about equality of interlocutors if allocation 
of the leader looks formal or non-existent). 
The third category is the ―Informational content‖- is a 
category which characterizes the act of communication ,even 
though is dependent to the communicative purposes of 
discourse. The purpose of a political discourse and its social 
mission is suggestion of the need of politically correct actions 
to addressees[10]. The next category is the ―Intentionality‖, a 
category of a discourse, offering the communicative intentions 
of the speaker. All verbal works including minor such as 
proverbs or quotes and major text s has the intention. 
Honoring the sphere of a discourse the intention or aim differs 
. For instance the intention of the literary works are to give 
enjoyment and express the whole picture to make reader feel 
the exact movements while reading, whilst on the contrary the 
aim of Political discourse deals only with real political events 
and speeches carried and rules of verbal behavior of 
expressing speech is hitherto dictated. The present category is 
closely connected with the following one ―Estimation‖. The 
occupation of the category is to emphasize the attention 
influencing on the consciousness of the reader. The sixth 
category is ―Conventionality‖, which is also called as 
interpretability or perceptual ability deals with the 
interpretation of realias. According to Komarov[11]the 
category of ―Conventionality‖ is split into three indications : 
cliché, being terminological, rituality. The next stage of 
category is ―Emotiveness‖ identically expressivity taking into 
diverse combinations also syntactic elements representing 
concrete discourses and texts.