|
Classroom learning, a real-world problem
Not enough knowledge about the learning environment described above is available.
However, we have identified theoretical frameworks to provide backing for this study and
taken into account factors that can affect learning outcome. In addition to contributing
epistemologically to the academic fields from which we have based our current research
design, the goal of this study is to obtain optimal student learning outcome because
classroom learning, vs. experimental study in a lab, is a real-world problem. For this
reason, we have to modify our research design as we identify best possible solutions
during current and future studies. Accordingly, the study seems to fit the model of
educational engineering, which stresses analysis and design in order to ensure the
eventual quality and effect of the educational artifact (Colpaert, forthcoming).
References
Anderson, R. (1993). Four operating principles and input distribution as explanations for
underdeveloped and mature morphological systems. In K. Hyltenstam & A. Viborg (Eds.),
Progression and Repression in Language (pp. 309
–
339). New York: Cambridge University
Press.
Anderson, R. (1994). The insider’s advantage. In A. Giacalone Ramat & M. Vedovelli
(Eds.), Italiano Lingua Seconda/Lingua Straniera (pp. 1
–
26). Rome: Bulzoni.
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language Testing in Practice. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Blyth, C. (1997).A constructvist approach to grammar: Teaching teachers to teach
aspect. Modern Language Journal, 81, 50
–
66.
Blyth, C. (2002). Between orality and literacy: Developing a pedagogical norm for
narrative discourse. In S. Gass, K. Bardovi-Harlig, S. Magnan, & J. Walz (Eds.),
Pedagogical Norms for Second and Foreign Language Lerning and Teaching (pp. 241
–
274). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Blyth, C. (2005). From empirical findings to the teaching of aspectual distinctions. In D.
Ayoun & M. R. Salaberry (Eds.) Tense and aspect in Romance Languages (pp. 211
–
252).
Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer Applications in Second Language Acquisiton.
Foundations for teaching, testing and research. New York: Cambridge University Press.
-181-
2014 CALL Conference
LINGUAPOLIS
www.antwerpcall.be
Cohen, A. D., Oxford, R. L., Chi, J. C. (2002). Learning Style Survey: Assessing Your
Own Learning Styles. Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition, University
of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN [In Cohen & Weaver, 2006, pp. 15
–
21].
Colpaert, J. (2012). The Publish and Perish Syndrome. Editorial in Computer Assisted
Language Learning, 25(5), pp. 383
–
391.
Colpaert, J. (forthcoming). Educational Engineering as Research Method: Some
epistemological considerations.
Dansereau, D. (1987). A discussion of techniques used in the teaching of the passé
compose/imparfait distinction in French. French Review, 61, 33
–
38.
De Bot, K. (1996). The psycholinguistics of output hypothesis. Language Learning, 46,
529
–
55.
Frantzen, Diana. (1995). Preterite/Imperfect half-truths: Problems with Spanish textbook
rules for usage. Hispania, 78, 145
–
158.
Garrett, N. (1986). The problem with grammar: What kind can the language learner use?
Modern Language Journal, 70, 133
–
148.
H
wu, F. (2003). Learners’ behaviors in computer
-based input activities elicited through
tracking technologies. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16(1), 5
29.
Hwu, F. (2004). On the applicability of input enhancement hypothesis and input
processing theory in multimedia CALL: The case of Spanish preterite and imperfect
instruction in an input application. CALICO Journal, 21(2), 317
338.
Hwu, F. (2004). The relationship between personality and learning behaviors in a
multimedia application for grammar instruction. Computer Assisted Language Instruction
Consortium (CALICO) Annual Symposium. Pittsburg.
Hwu, F. (2005). Spanish preterite and imperfect in conversations: The pragmatic
meanings. Journal of Languages and Linguistics, 4(2): 183
–
206.
Hwu, F. (2007
). Learners’ strategies with a grammar application: The influence of
language ability and personality preferences. ReCALL Journal, 19(1), 21
38.
Salaberry, R. (2005). Evidence for transfer of knowledge of aspect from L2 Spanish to L3
Portuguese. In D. Ayoun & M. R. Salaberry (Eds.) Tense and aspect in Romance
languages. (pp. 179
–
210). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins
Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B.
Seildlhofer (Eds.), Principles and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. G.
Widdowson (pp. 125
–
144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tomasello, M. (2002). The item-
based nature of children’s early syntactic development.
In M. Tomasello & E. Bates (Eds.), Language development: The essential readings (pp.
169
–
186). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Westfall, Ruth and Foerster, Sharon. (1996). Beyond aspect: New strategies for teaching
the preterite and the imperfect. Hispania, 79, 550-560.
-182-
2014 CALL Conference
LINGUAPOLIS
www.antwerpcall.be
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |
