No Paper Title Author Name Page No

 
CENTRAL ASIAN JOURNAL OF LITERATURE, PHILOSOPHY AND CULTURE 
 
Volume: 03 Issue: 04 | April 2022
, 
ISSN: 2660-6828 
© 2022, CAJLPC, Central Asian Studies, All Rights Reserved
 
66
Copyright (c) 2022 Author (s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 
License (CC BY).To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 
between postmodernism and modernism. In brief, we have sketched out the reasoning at the back of the two 
approaches: one specializing in how postmodernism continues the modernist task of dissent and one 
specializing in how postmodernism innovates officially past the modernist novel. 
With this in mind, World War II and subsequent cold battle narratives will be function pivots in my look. 
Virtually such wartime and submit-conflict narratives are precisely what Lyotard and others have in thoughts 
once they communicate about postmodernism‟s responsibility to cripple and fight grand
‐
and 
meta
‐
narratives. Consequently, one chronic aspect of my thinking will ask in what ways each novel doe 
violence to the grand narratives, through taking them on at once, or via reimagining the struggle and the 
following status quo of worldwide order via an illustration of that which has no longer been deemed 
presentable inside the established order of reputable histories. Or, to ask this question in some other manner: 
how does each novel take at the effective voices controlling public discourse, and in what approaches does 
each novel try and get better the persecuted voices silenced through the controlling public discourses? 
At this point, we would love to reassert my scepticism of the usefulness of such constructs of historical 
periods as modernity and post modernity. Unavoidably, the means tethered to a name that certainly represents 
years becomes stretched to house greater subjective interpretations. Such unregulated expansion diminishes 
the usefulness of the original designation. For instance, to articulate what is so new approximately 
postmodernism, critics and theorists frequently prevail simplest by neglecting discussion of comparable 
sensibilities displayed earlier than the postmodern generation? In a feel, this method can be considered a part 
of the definition of postmodernism. We imply that postmodernism is a continuation of humanity‟s compulsion 
in the direction of cause, common sense, and taxonomy, now achieved with dwindling certainty because of 
widespread scepticism in reason, good judgment, and taxonomy. One implication of this argument is that 
philosophy isn‟t almost as dependent on global activities because of the linguistic proximity among, for 
example, postmodernism and post modernity imply.