Neurolinguistic & psycholinguistic investigations on evidentiality in Turkish

xii 
Table 3.3.
The means and standard deviations for the measures of verb 
inflection
.............................................................................................. 72
Table 3.4.
Means and standard deviations (sd) of the numbers and type 
token ratios (TTR) for the 3 most frequently used verb forms
............. 72
Table 4.1. 
Examples for the evidentiality (1-4) and time reference (5-8) 
sentences used in the during-listening RTs task, sentences that contain 
the evidentiality violations violation are shown in conditions 2 & 4, the 
time reference violations are given in conditions 6 & 8.
..................... 96
Table 4.2.
Fixed-effects from the generalized linear mixed-effects model 
performed on response-accuracies and fixed-effects from the linear 
mixed-effects model performed on RTs to the evidentiality violations 
(Group = monolingual vs. heritage speakers; Condition = Seen-
Indirect vs. Heard-Direct).
................................................................ 100
Table 4.3.
Fixed-effects from the generalized linear mixed-effects model 
performed on response-accuracies and the linear mixed-effects model 
performed on RTs to the time reference violations (Condition = 
monolingual vs. heritage speakers; Group = FutPs vs. PsFut).
....... 103
Table 5.1.
Numbers and age of participants, AoA = age of acquisition in 
years with min-max age range, and proficiency test scores (ranges in 
brackets) in Turkish and German for bilingual participants
............. 123
Table 5.2.
Mean proportion of accuracy, standard error rates (SE), and 
response times (RTs) of click responses
............................................ 131
Table 5.3.
Fixed effects from the generalized linear mixed-effects 
regression models performed on accuracy of clicks and linear mixed-
effects regression model performed on response times
..................... 132