7
defense of local families, tribes, and clans that have historically been victims of
discrimination and persecution in Iraq. This makes them fundamentally different from
insurgencies and criminal organizations. After the invasion in 2003 U.S. military units
were incapable of establishing a presence everywhere, and Shia militias were employed
to “organize security, suppress looting and restore basic services.”
23
They emerged at a
time when the local populace lacked state services and established regional peace and
stability by negotiating with representative at the provincial level responsible for
implementing state rule.
24
This led to accommodation between the militias and those
charged with implementing state policy.
25
Not only do militias provide a level of social
stability, economic support to the community, and security for local neighborhoods, they
also provide incentives for the local population to join the militia, thus cementing their
position in Shia society. According to Crenshaw, “incentives [include] a variety of
individual needs: to belong to a group, to acquire social status, and reputation, to find
comradeship or excitement, or to gain material benefits.”
26
Thus, militias aspire to regional political autonomy in order to acquire national
power. Unlike criminals and insurgents, militias mobilize the local populace through
tribal, family, and religious ties that were developed over generations, through their
acceptance as a quasi-official group that is loosely allied with the state and their ability to
serve as protectors of the local population when battling an occupation force. They are
imbued with a certain level of legitimacy both by the people and by the current
23
“Behind Iraq’s Moqtada Intifada,” in Time Incorporated [database online]. New York, New York
April 5, 2004 [cited 2007]. Available from
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,608113,00.html
(accessed March 5, 2007).
24
Liam Anderson and Gareth Stansfield,
The Future of Iraq: Dictatorship, Democracy, or Division?
1sted. (New York, N.Y.: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004), 127, 133, 135. Historically they have served an
important purpose of defense against internal threats and external threats. Internal threats include the Baath
party that systematically marginalized the Shia population through executions, imprisonment, torture, and
censorship of fundamental religious ideology. During the late 1980’s the Shia militia’s prevented
government forces from entering the Shia slum of Sadr City (formerly known as Saddam City) which
facilitated the idea of opposition towards the minority-ruling Baath party. Shia militias have also served as
protection from external threats such as the Iranians during the Iran-Iraq war in the 1980s and as far back as
the colonial occupation of the British in the 1920s.
25
Joel S. Migdal,
Strong Societies and Weak States: State-Society Relations and State Capabilities in
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: