Introduction
This legal memorandum will describe a case R v Guraj (respondent)1, in which Ludvik Guraj was found criminally liable because of having heroin and money laundering. Moreover, this case involves procedural issues related to confiscation in this criminal process. Firstly, skeleton arguments of applicant and respondent will be discussed in this paper. Secondly, it will analyze which primary and secondary legislations were used in this process and which reasonable methods are included by judges. Lastly, works of scholars that are relatable to this case and conclusion will be addressed in this legal process.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |