|
BASIC DATA
A.
Loan Identification
1.
Country
2.
Loan Number
3.
Project Title
4.
Borrower
5.
Name of Executive Agency
6.
Amount of Loan
7.
Project Completion Report Number
Republic of Uzbekistan
2338
Public Finance Management Reform Project
Republic of Uzbekistan
Ministry of Finance
$20,700,000
1660
B.
Loan and Grant Data
1.
Appraisal
– Date Started
– Date Completed
2.
Loan Negotiations
– Date Started
– Date Completed
3.
Date of Board Approval
4.
Date of Loan Agreement
5.
Date of Loan Effectiveness
– In Loan Agreement
– Actual
– Number of Extensions
6.
Closing Date
– In Loan Agreement
– Actual
– Number of Extensions
7.
Terms of Loan
– Interest Rate
– Maturity
– Grace Period
22 March 2007
18 April 2007
3 May 2007
8 May 2007
28 June 2007
10 December 2007
9 March 2008
14 December 2007
0
31 July 2012
21 November 2012
0
Sum of the London interbank offered rate and
0.60% per year
25 years
4 years
8.
Disbursements
a.
Dates
Initial Disbursement
31 March 2008
Final Disbursement
30 July 2012
Time Interval
52.0 months
Effective Date
14 December 2007
Actual Closing Date
21 November 2012
Time Interval
59.3 months
ii
b.
Loan Amount ($’000)
Category
Original
Allocation
Last
Revised
Allocation
Amount
Canceled
Amount
Disbursed
Undisbursed
Balance
a
1. Goods
18,837
6,597
12,240
6,194
403
2. Consulting Services
380
0
380
0
0
3. Project Management
203
203
0
161
42
4. Unallocated
1,280
0
1,280
0
0
Total
20,700
6,800
13,900
6,355
445
a
Canceled on the loan closing date.
Note: A total of $14.35 million or 69.29% of loan proceeds were canceled. Numbers may not sum precisely because
of rounding.
C.
Project Data
1.
Project Cost ($’000)
Cost
Appraisal Estimate
Actual
Foreign Exchange Cost
20,700
6,355
Local Currency Cost
16,600
16,289
Total
37,360
22,644
Note: The Detailed Cost Estimates and Financing Plan was not published in the report and recommendation of the
President as this information was deemed confidential per the Asian Development Bank Public Communications
Policy.
2.
Financing Plan ($’000)
Cost
Appraisal Estimate
Actual
Implementation Costs
Borrower Financed
16,660
16,284
ADB Financed
20,700
6,335
Other External Financing
0
0
Total
37,360
22,619
IDC Costs
Borrower Financed
0
5
ADB Financed
0
0
Other External Financing
0
0
Total
0
5
ADB = Asian Development Bank, IDC = interest during construction.
3.
Cost Breakdown by Project Component ($’000)
Component
Appraisal Estimate
Actual
Establishment of a Treasury Institutional Network and
Support for Capacity Building
10,200
11,683
Modernization of Treasury Operations
22,740
10,794
Project Management
530
206
Total
33,470
22,683
4.
Project Schedule
Item
Appraisal Estimate
Actual
Establishment of a Treasury Institutional Network and
Support for Capacity Building
Treasury Office Refurbishment
August 2008
August 2008
MOF IT Staff Training and Certification
October 2008
October 2008
Modernization of Treasury Operations
GFMIS Software and Main Servers (1 pack)
1
October 2009
a
Did not proceed
1
At appraisal, the COTS package and Servers were to be procured together.
iii
Item
Appraisal Estimate
Actual
Main Servers
October 2009
October 2014
2
Engagement of Software Developer
N/A
3
March 2016
Computers and Network for Treasury Offices
(2 packs)
March 2010
December 2011
Telecom and Networking Equipment (3 packs)
December 2009
December 2011
Project Management
PMO Operation, Monitoring, and Evaluation
December 2011
December 2011
IT and/or Procurement Adviser (international)
May 2009
Did not proceed
GFMIS = government financial management information system, IT = information technology, MOF = Ministry of
Finance, PMO = project management office.
a
The procurement packages were to (i) change servers and (ii) engage a software developer.
5.
Project Performance Report Ratings
Implementation Period
Ratings
a
Development
Objectives
Implementation
Progress
From 29 June 2007 to 28 February 2008
Satisfactory
Satisfactory
From 28 February 2008 to 27 February 2009
Highly Satisfactory
Highly Satisfactory
From 27 February 2009 to 31 December 2009
Satisfactory
Satisfactory
From 1January 2010 to 31 December 2010
Satisfactory
Satisfactory
From 1 January 2011 to 30 June 2011
Potential Problem
From 1 July 2011 to 31 March 2012
Actual Problem
From 1 April 2012 to 30 June 2012
Potential Problem
From 1 July 2012 to 21 November 2012
On Track
a
Effective 1 January 2011, the project performance report system was replaced by a new project performance rating
system that no longer provides separate ratings of development objectives and implementation progress and
instead gives an overall project rating.
Note: No project rating was indicated in the system for 2013–2016 since the loan account was closed.
D
Data on Asian Development Bank Missions
Name of Mission
Date
No. of
Persons
No. of
Person-Days
Specialization
of Members
Appraisal Mission
2–18 April 2007
a, b, c, d
b, c, d
Inception Mission
15 April 2008–6 May 2008
1
5
b, c, d
Review Mission
Multiple dates
a
1
2
Midterm Review
12 December 2011–20 January
2012
2
10
b, c, d
Loan Review
July 2012
2
10
b, c
Project Completion
Review
June 2017
2
30
b, b, c
a = senior portfolio specialist, b = national officer, c = project analyst, d = staff consultant.
a
ADB HQ delegated project administration to the Uzbekistan Resident Mission (URM). In addition to official
missions, the URM reviewed project activities through daily discussions, weekly and/or monthly meetings, and
quarterly reviews under quarterly portfolio review exercises.
2
Changes to procurement resulted is separate procurement of Servers
3
At appraisal the proposal was for procurement of a COTS package, there was no engagement of a separate
software developer.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |
