Microsoft Word 5rev Adopting a Blended Learning Approach Challenges Encountered and Lessons Learned in an Action Research Study docx



Download 266,27 Kb.
Pdf ko'rish
bet7/15
Sana21.04.2022
Hajmi266,27 Kb.
#570700
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   ...   15
Bog'liq
blended learning article from google

A.
 
Study Procedure
The action research study focused on five areas of the students’ experiences during the pilot study: 1) Did 
the blended approach improve student learning?; 2) Did the blended approach increase students’ active 
involvement in the course and engagement in the course material?; 3) Did the students feel more prepared 
for in-class activities after learning the content online?; 4) Did the blended approach increase student 
participation during the face-to-face classes?; and, 5) Did the blended approach increase student interest 
in the material and overall satisfaction with the course? 
To measure these questions four types of data were collected. The same unit exam on development was 
given to all three sections of the course in order to compare the blended section results with the other two 
non-blended sections. The unit exam consisted of multiple choice and short answer questions measuring 


Adopting a Blended Learning Approach: Challenges Encountered and Lessons Learned in an Action 
Research Study 
52
Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, Volume 15: Issue 1
understanding and application of the topics covered in the development unit. A survey was given to the 
blended section after the unit was completed to measure student perceptions of how the approach affected 
their levels of learning, participation, interest, and satisfaction. Informal observations of student behavior 
during face-to-face sessions and tracking statistics of students’ viewing of the course materials on the 
website were used to determine the level of student participation in the three sections.
B.
 
Study Results
Question #1: Did the blended approach improve student learning?
 
On the unit test, the blended section had a slightly higher average score (47.46 out of 60) than both the 
large, non-blended section (44.34) and the small, non-blended section (47.40). These results were 
promising and showed that students could learn the material on their own online. Their learning did not 
suffer using a blended approach, and actually was slightly better.
Fifty-six students voluntarily answered the survey. Forty eight percent (48%) of the students were males 
and 52% were females. The majority indicated that they were “very proficient” in the use of technology, 
with only 5% claiming that they were “not very proficient”. Seventy-five percent (75%) had never taken 
a blended course.
On the survey, 75% of the students agreed that the blended approach contributed to their learning.
Eighty-four percent (84%) felt the online assignments and 77% felt the face-to-face sessions contributed 
to their learning.
 
Question #2: Did the blended approach increase students’ active involvement in the course and 
engagement in the course material? 
Sixty-four percent (64%) of the students felt more engaged in the course material with the blended 
format.
Question #3: Did the students feel more prepared for in-class activities after learning the content online. 
On the survey 66% of the students reported that they felt more prepared for in-class work using the 
blended approach.
Question #4: Did the blended approach increase student participation during the face-to-face classes?
Forty-eight percent (48%) of the students perceived that their participation in class increased as a result of 
the blended format. During informal observations of in-class student participation, the student response 
rate to questions tended to be higher in the small, non-blended section and lowest in the large, blended 
class. This was somewhat surprising since it was hypothesized that doing the online content assignments 
would prepare the students, thus increasing their confidence and willingness to participate in the larger 
class. During the class sessions when the blended class was divided in half, the student response rate 
increased which seemed to indicate that class size rather than preparation was more of a factor influencing 
participation, but no firm conclusions could be made due to the non-rigorous nature of the data collection.
Question #5: Did the blended approach increase student interest in the material and overall satisfaction 
with the course? 
The blended unit helped to promote interest in the course material, with 59% of the students perceiving an 
increased interest in the content and 75% indicating that the approach helped them to go more in-depth on 
the topics. 
 
Viewing statistics on the course management system showed that students in the blended class 
looked at the optional, supplemental course resource materials provided on Blackboard more frequently 
than the students in the other two non-blended sections. It could be assumed that this was because they 
were required to use Blackboard in order to complete the online assignments and, as a result, were 
exposed to and hopefully more interested in viewing the additional, non-required material. 
On the survey 90% of the students reported that they liked the convenience of the blended approach, 88% 
liked working independently at their own pace; 68% felt more comfortable expressing themselves with 
the blended approach, and 65% felt that the blended activities promoted a learning community, allowing 


Adopting a Blended Learning Approach: Challenges Encountered and Lessons Learned in an Action 
Research Study 
Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, Volume 15: Issue 1
53
them to interact more easily with other class members. General student comments included: 
“I thought it worked well, I was much more prepared for in-class discussion/participation; learned on my 
own while also in-class extended my knowledge on the information.”

Download 266,27 Kb.

Do'stlaringiz bilan baham:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   ...   15




Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©hozir.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling

kiriting | ro'yxatdan o'tish
    Bosh sahifa
юртда тантана
Боғда битган
Бугун юртда
Эшитганлар жилманглар
Эшитмадим деманглар
битган бодомлар
Yangiariq tumani
qitish marakazi
Raqamli texnologiyalar
ilishida muhokamadan
tasdiqqa tavsiya
tavsiya etilgan
iqtisodiyot kafedrasi
steiermarkischen landesregierung
asarlaringizni yuboring
o'zingizning asarlaringizni
Iltimos faqat
faqat o'zingizning
steierm rkischen
landesregierung fachabteilung
rkischen landesregierung
hamshira loyihasi
loyihasi mavsum
faolyatining oqibatlari
asosiy adabiyotlar
fakulteti ahborot
ahborot havfsizligi
havfsizligi kafedrasi
fanidan bo’yicha
fakulteti iqtisodiyot
boshqaruv fakulteti
chiqarishda boshqaruv
ishlab chiqarishda
iqtisodiyot fakultet
multiservis tarmoqlari
fanidan asosiy
Uzbek fanidan
mavzulari potok
asosidagi multiservis
'aliyyil a'ziym
billahil 'aliyyil
illaa billahil
quvvata illaa
falah' deganida
Kompyuter savodxonligi
bo’yicha mustaqil
'alal falah'
Hayya 'alal
'alas soloh
Hayya 'alas
mavsum boyicha


yuklab olish