In the last decade, Digital Platforms have transformed how the world shops, travels, eats, communicates,
and is entertained. Platform models—such as Facebook, Amazon, Netflix, WhatsApp, Uber, and Airbnb—
have fundamentally reshaped markets. In the process, they have become some
of the most valuable com-
panies in history. In fact, Platform models composed 60-70% of a recent list of 200 “unicorns” (start-ups
with valuations of USD 1 billion or more) and net earnings of Platforms on the S&P 500 have grown
nearly 20 times faster than the average.
Despite this, the rise of Platforms in smallholder agricultural markets lags behind that in other sectors by
up to two decades. Early pioneers have garnered significant attention, but there remains limited under-
standing in the sector of what constitutes a Platform, with many using the word to describe a variety of
different models. Despite
this lack of shared definition, a number of donors are pursuing strategies to
realize the promise of Platforms in the agricultural sector. This focus has only increased in the wake of the
COVID-19 pandemic, with digital service provision seeing significant uptake across the globe.
In this report, we examine the emergence of Platforms in smallholder-related agricultural markets in
order to bring some clarity to the sector. This exercise has been more extensive and complex than much
of
our previous research, in large part because Digital Platforms are complex and come in many forms.
This research required delving deeply into the dynamics of Platforms to establish a shared definition of
the term, as well as analyzing decades of Platform experience in more developed markets and sectors.
The findings in this report have been heavily influenced by almost two decades of academic and business
research focused on Platform models and network effects. From this, we have extrapolated lessons to
guide the early emergence of agricultural Platforms, including what challenges we can expect to emerge.
By making clear distinctions between different Platform models, this report clarifies
an increasingly overused
and ill-defined concept in agricultural development. We remain convinced that Platforms have the potential
to transform smallholder agriculture into a more inclusive, sustainable, and commercially viable endeavor,
and to greatly increase smallholder farmers’ access to products, services, information, and investment.
At
the same time, we believe it is necessary for donors, investors, researchers, and providers to approach
the promise of Platform models with deeper understanding. This includes more specificity of language,
better understanding of complex business models and the role of subsidy, and recognition
of the potential
negative impacts that can come from mis-managed Platform models. Our hope is that this report can help
us collectively take that next step forward.