Kichik biznes va tadbirkorlikda rahbarning boshqaruv uslubi

Kichik biznes va tadbirkorlikda rahbarning

boshqaruv uslubi

Rahbarning boshqaruv uslubi deganda, boshqaruv jarayonida kelib chiqadigan muammolarini hal qilish usullari majmui tushuniladi.
Kichik biznes va tadbirkorlikda rahbarlikning quyidagi boshqa-ruv uslublaridan foydalaniladi:
1. Xo`jalik ishlaridagi kamchiliklarga murosasiz bo`lish.
2. Jamoa va uning har bir xodimi to`g`risida qayg`urish.
3. YUqori madaniyatli boshqaruvning tashkil qilish.
4. Rahbarning yangilikni his etish qobiliyati.
Kichik biznes faoliyatini boshqarishning bir necha pog`onalari mavjud. Ularga ikki pog`onali, uch pog`onali va ko`p pog`onali boshqaruvni misol qilib ko`rsatish mumkin. Kichik biznes faoliyatini boshqarishda jahon amaliyotidan olingan va eng samaralisi hisoblangan ikki pog`onali usul, ya’ni rahbar-bajaruvchi usulidan keng foydalaniladi.
Bu usulning samarasi uning oddiyligida, bajaruvchi va rahbar o`rtasidagi munosabatlarni to`g`ridan-to`g`ri bog`langanligidadir. Bu yerda nazoratning yuqori samarasiga erishiladi. Pog`onalar soni ortib borgan sari boshqaruv samarasi kamayib boradi.
Small business, entrepreneurship and innovation. Institute for Competitiveness & Prosperity. Working Paper 15 February 2012.

All businesses begin as start-ups and will reach a certain size depending on the degree to which they are truly entrepreneurial. Most start-ups are not entrepreneurial. Most stay small because the owners prefer to operate a small, steady business – for example, the local law firm or dry cleaner; or because the business simply cannot be scaled up, despite the owner’s vision. Many start-ups fail in their early years. In summary, most smaller firms have ongoing steady operations that do not grow. Some are truly entrepreneurial in that they bring special talents and skills to develop innovative products, services, or business processes to achieve a competitive advantage that fuels their business growth. Both types of firms began as start-ups. But the economic impact of smaller businesses and entrepreneurial businesses differ.
We have see n that smaller firms and entrepreneurs are important players in our economy. But are there special features of their contribution and of the barriers they face that require special treatment in public policy? We first summarize the rationale for special treatment of industries and firms, often seen as a necessity to overcome “market failure.” We then review the evidence to determine if smaller firms and entrepreneurs are affected by market failure – concluding that, by and large, the evidence is pretty slim. The real public policy challenge is to identify and encourage, if necessary, the truly entrepreneurial firms that can grow and make a difference to our economic prospects.
What is market failure?
Economists observe that a competitive market allocates resources efficiently.
Investments flow to businesses with the best returns, with appropriate adjustments for risk; wages are paid to most skilled and productive workers; and prices adjust to reflect the value of products as perceived by customers. In allocating resources through these mechanisms, the market achieves the maximum economic output and well being for its citizens with the most efficient use of resources. In any economy, structures or conditions may stand in the way of the best allocation of resources by the market – this is called market failure. Resources are allocated efficiently when, for each good produced, its marginal cost of production is equal to its marginal benefit. When this condition is violated, market failure occurs.
Market failure is commonly found in four situations; some argue that the externalities and informational asymmetries do affect smaller and entrepreneurial firms.16