Short-Selling Comes Under Fire—Again
to fall, shorts may be anticipating a decline in the stock
price. Their sales simply force the market to reflect the
deteriorating prospects of troubled firms sooner than it
might have otherwise. In other words, short-selling is part
of the process by which the full range of information and
opinion—pessimistic as well as optimistic—is brought to
bear on stock prices.
For example, short-sellers took large (negative) posi-
tions in firms such as WorldCom, Enron, and Tyco even
before these firms were exposed by regulators. In fact, one
might argue that these emerging short positions helped
regulators identify the previously undetected scandals.
And in the end, Lehman and Bear Stearns were brought
down by their very real losses on their mortgage-related
investments—not by unfounded rumors.
Academic research supports the conjecture that short
sales contribute to efficient “price discovery.” For example,
the greater the demand for shorting a stock, the lower
its future returns tend to be; moreover, firms that attack
short-sellers with threats of legal action or bad publicity
tend to have especially poor future returns.
1
Short-sale
bans may in the end be nothing more than an understand-
able, but nevertheless misguided, impulse to “shoot the
messenger.”
1
See, for example, C. Jones and O. A. Lamont, “Short Sale Constraints
and Stock Returns,” Journal of Financial Economics, November 2002,
pp. 207–39, or O. A. Lamont, “Go Down Fighting: Short Sellers vs.
Firms,” Yale ICF Working Paper No. 04–20, July 2004.
bod61671_ch03_059-091.indd 84
bod61671_ch03_059-091.indd 84
6/18/13 7:44 PM
6/18/13 7:44 PM
Final PDF to printer
85
public, and, probably most important, misleading financial statements and accounting
practices. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act was passed by Congress in 2002 in response to these
problems. Among the key reforms are:
•
Creation of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board to oversee the
auditing of public companies.
•
Rules requiring independent financial experts to serve on audit committees of a
firm’s board of directors.
•
CEOs and CFOs must now personally certify that their firms’ financial reports
“fairly represent, in all material respects, the operations and financial condition
of the company,” and are subject to personal penalties if those reports turn out to
be misleading. Following the letter of the rules may still be necessary, but it is no
longer sufficient accounting practice.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |