C H A P T E R
1 9
Financial
Statement
Analysis
657
generating enough cash flow to support the extra interest burden of the debt, as the falling
cash flow from operations indicates. Eventually, when the firm loses its ability to borrow
further, its growth will be at an end.
At this point GI stock might be an attractive investment. Its market price is only 12% of
its book value, and with a P/E ratio of 4, its earnings yield is 25% per year. GI is a likely
candidate for a takeover by another firm that might replace GI’s management and build
shareholder value through a radical change in policy.
2013
2014
2015
Cash flow from operating activities
Net income
$ 11,700
$ 10,143
$ 5,285
1
Depreciation
15,000
18,000
21,600
1
Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable
(5,000)
(6,000)
(7,200)
1
Decrease (increase) in inventories
(15,000)
(18,000)
(21,600)
1
Increase in accounts payable
6,000
7,200
8,640
Cash provided by operations
$ 12,700
$ 11,343
$ 6,725
Cash flow from investing activities
Investment in plant and equipment*
$(45,000)
$(54,000)
$(64,800)
Cash flow from financing activities
Dividends paid
†
$
0
$
0
$
0
Short-term debt issued
42,300
54,657
72,475
Change in cash and marketable securities
‡
$ 10,000
$ 12,000
$ 14,400
Table 19.13
Growth Industries statement of cash flows ($ thousand)
*Gross investment equals increase in net plant and equipment plus depreciation.
†
We can conclude that no dividends are paid because stockholders’ equity increases each year by the full amount of net income, imply-
ing a plowback ratio of 1.0.
‡
Equals cash flow from operations plus cash flow from investment activities plus cash flow from financing activities. Note that this
equals the yearly change in cash and marketable securities on the balance sheet.
You have the following information for IBX Corporation for the years 2013 and 2015 (all figures are in
$ million):
2013
2015
Net income
$ 253.7
$ 239.0
Pretax income
411.9
375.6
EBIT
517.6
403.1
Average assets
4,857.9
3,459.7
Sales
6,679.3
4,537.0
Shareholders’ equity
2,233.3
2,347.3
What is the trend in IBX’s ROE; how can you account for it in terms of tax burden, margin, turnover, and
financial leverage?
CONCEPT CHECK
19.4
bod61671_ch19_635-677.indd 657
bod61671_ch19_635-677.indd 657
7/17/13 4:13 PM
7/17/13 4:13 PM
Final PDF to printer
658
P A R T V
Security
Analysis
Financial statement analysis gives us a good amount of ammunition for evaluating a com-
pany’s performance and future prospects. But comparing financial results of different com-
panies is not so simple. There is more than one acceptable way to represent various items
of revenue and expense according to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
This means two firms may have exactly the same economic income yet very different
accounting incomes.
Furthermore, interpreting a single firm’s performance over time is complicated when
inflation distorts the dollar measuring rod. Comparability problems are especially acute
in this case because the impact of inflation on reported results often depends on the par-
ticular method the firm adopts to account for inventories and depreciation. The security
analyst must adjust the earnings and the financial ratio figures to a uniform standard before
attempting to compare financial results across firms and over time.
Comparability problems can arise out of the flexibility of GAAP guidelines in account-
ing for inventories and depreciation and in adjusting for the effects of inflation. Other
important potential sources of noncomparability include the capitalization of leases and
other expenses, the treatment of pension costs, and allowances for reserves.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: