Examples 14.6 and 14.7 demonstrate that as interest rates change, bond investors are
actually subject to two sources of offsetting risk. On the one hand, when rates rise, bond
prices fall, which reduces the value of the portfolio. On the other hand, reinvested coupon
will offset the impact of price risk. In Chapter 16, we will explore this trade-off in more
detail and will discover that by carefully tailoring their bond portfolios, investors can pre-
As we noted earlier, a bond will sell at par value when its coupon rate equals the market
interest rate. In these circumstances, the investor receives fair compensation for the time
value of money in the form of the recurring coupon payments. No further capital gain is
When the coupon rate is lower than the market interest rate, the coupon payments alone
will not provide investors as high a return as they could earn elsewhere in the market. To
receive a competitive return on such an investment, investors also need some price appre-
ciation on their bonds. The bonds, therefore, must sell below par value to provide a “built-
464
P A R T I V
Fixed-Income
Securities
When bond prices are set according to the present
value formula, any discount from par value provides an
anticipated capital gain that will augment a below-market
coupon rate by just enough to provide a fair total rate of
return. Conversely, if the coupon rate exceeds the market
interest rate, the interest income by itself is greater than
that available elsewhere in the market. Investors will bid
up the price of these bonds above their par values. As the
bonds approach maturity, they will fall in value because
fewer of these above-market coupon payments remain. The resulting capital losses offset
the large coupon payments so that the bondholder again receives only a competitive rate
of return.
Problem 14 at the end of the chapter asks you to work through the case of the high-
coupon bond. Figure 14.6 traces out the price paths of high- and low-coupon bonds (net of
accrued interest) as time to maturity approaches, at least for the case in which the market
interest rate is constant. The low-coupon bond enjoys capital gains, whereas the high-
coupon bond suffers capital losses.
11
We use these examples to show that each bond offers investors the same total rate of
return. Although the capital gains versus income components differ, the price of each
bond is set to provide competitive rates, as we should expect in well-functioning capital
markets. Security returns all should be comparable on an after-tax risk-adjusted basis. If
they are not, investors will try to sell low-return securities, thereby driving down their
prices until the total return at the now-lower price is competitive with other securities.
To illustrate built-in capital gains or losses, suppose a bond was issued several years ago
when the interest rate was 7%. The bond’s annual coupon rate was thus set at 7%. (We
will suppose for simplicity that the bond pays its coupon annually.) Now, with 3 years left
in the bond’s life, the interest rate is 8% per year. The bond’s market price is the present
value of the remaining annual coupons plus payment of par value. That present value is
10
$70 3 Annuity factor(8%, 3) 1 $1,000 3 PV factor(8%, 3) 5 $974.23
which is less than par value.
In another year, after the next coupon is paid and remaining maturity falls to two
years, the bond would sell at
$70 3 Annuity factor(8%, 2) 1 $1,000 3 PV factor(8%, 2) 5 $982.17
thereby yielding a capital gain over the year of $7.94. If an investor had purchased the
bond at $974.23, the total return over the year would equal the coupon payment plus
capital gain, or $70 1 $7.94 5 $77.94. This represents a rate of return of $77.94/$974.23,
or 8%, exactly the rate of return currently available elsewhere in the market.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: