Monitoring, review and audit 107
in priority order (those actions which are most
important rather than those which can be easily
done quickly)
➤
identifying those responsible for taking remedial
actions, with sensible timescales to track progress
on implementation
➤
periodic monitoring to identify common themes
which might reveal underlying problems in the
system
➤
management information on the frequency or nature
of the monitoring arrangements.
Appendix 7.1 gives examples of poor workplaces which
can be used for practice exercises. Appendix 7.2 shows
a basic list of inspection issues, which can be adapted
to any particular organization’s needs. A policy checklist
is given in Chapter 2.
7.6.3 Safety sampling Safety sampling is a helpful technique that helps organ-
izations to concentrate on one particular area or sub-
ject at a time. A specifi c area is chosen which can be
inspected in about thirty minutes. A checklist is drawn
up to facilitate the inspection looking at specifi c issues.
These may be different types of hazard; they may be
unsafe acts or conditions noted; they may be pro-active,
good behaviour or practices noted.
The inspection team or person then carries out
the sampling at the same time each day or week in the
specifi ed period. The results are recorded and analysed
to see if the changes are good or bad over time. Of
course, defects noted must be brought to the notice of
the appropriate person for action on each occasion.
7.7 Who should monitor performance? Performance should be measured at each manage-
ment level from directors downwards. It is not suffi cient
to monitor by exception, where unless problems are
raised, it is assumed to be satisfactory. Senior managers
must satisfy themselves that the correct arrangements
are in place and working properly. Responsibilities for
both active and reactive monitoring must be laid down
and managers need to be personally involved in making
sure that plans and objectives are met and compliance
with standards is achieved. Although systems may be
set up with the guidance of safety professionals, man-
agers should be personally involved and given suffi cient
training to be competent to make informed judgements
about monitoring performance.
Other people like safety representatives will also
have the right to inspect the workplace. Each employee
should be encouraged to inspect their own workplace
frequently to check for obvious problems and rectify
them if possible or report hazards to their supervisors.
Specifi c statutory (or thorough) examinations of, for
example, lifting equipment or pressure vessels, have to
be carried out at intervals laid down in written schemes
by competent persons – usually specially trained and
experienced inspection/insurance company personnel.