Before World War I
Prior to the start of World War I in 1914, the international monet-
ary system operated mostly under a
gold standard
whereby the currencies of major countries
were convertible into gold at fi xed exchange rates. For example, 1 ounce of gold might be
worth 20 U.S. dollars, or $1 would be worth one-twentieth (or .05) of an ounce of gold. At
the same time, 1 ounce of gold might be worth 5 French francs (FF), or FF1 would be worth
one-fi fth (or .20) of an ounce of gold. Since $20 could be converted into one ounce of gold that
could then be used to purchase 5 FF, or 20 U.S. dollars, the exchange rate between the dollar
and franc would be 20 to 5, or 4 to 1. Alternatively, .20 ÷ .05 equals 4 to 1.
Recall from Chapter 2 that the American colonies relied primarily on the Spanish dollar
to conduct business transactions prior to the 1800s. In 1792, the fi rst U.S. monetary act was
enacted and provided for a
bimetallic standard
based on both gold and silver. A standard based
solely on gold was not adopted until 1879. In those days, coins were
full-bodied money
in that
their metal content was worth the same as their face values. Paper money then was
represent-
ative full-bodied money
, because the paper money was backed by an amount of precious metal
equal to the money’s face value.
During the 1800s most other developed countries also had their own currencies tied to
gold, silver, or both. By the end of the 1800s most countries had adopted just the gold standard.
However, coinciding with the start of World War I, most countries went off the gold standard.
For example, the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 provided for the issuance of Federal Reserve
Notes, called
fi at money
because they were not backed by either gold or silver. Recall from
Chapter 2 that the government decreed the notes to be “legal tender” for purposes of making
payments and discharging public and private debts. Fiat money has value that is based solely
on confi dence in the U.S. government’s being able to achieve economic growth and maintain
price stability. Most foreign governments also moved to monetary systems based on fi at money.
A major criticism of the gold standard was that as the volume of world trade increased
over the years, the supply of “new” gold would fail to keep pace. Thus, without some form of
supplementary international money, the result would be international defl ation. A second cri-
ticism of the gold standard was a lack of an international organization to monitor and report
whether countries were deviating from the standard when it was in their own best interests.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |