94
I P T F O R P T S D
Treatment concluded as scheduled, with the therapist asking Chuck to
check in after six months, or before if needed. Chuck gruffly hugged his ther-
apist in departing. At six month follow- up,
he reported feeling fine, had had a
work promotion, and said things were “great” at home.
This is a dramatically positive story; not all cases go so smoothly. On the
other hand, patients in extreme pain, once engaged, have great incentive to
work on their problems. Although the therapist could conceivably have for-
mulated the treatment as either a role dispute (particularly at home)
or a role
transition, or even grief over his lost buddies, the global range of Chuck’s ad-
justment difficulties argued for focusing on this role transition. Note, too, how
different the process of this IPT case was, in focusing on defining and normal-
izing affect and using it to win small interpersonal victories, from an exposure
therapy that would have focused on past traumatic events in Fallujah.
CASE E X AMPLE 3 [ TRE ATED BY K ATHRYN
BLEIBERG, PH.D.]
Deborah, a 32- year- old single white woman working in public relations with
chronic PTSD
and recurrent major depression, was referred by a trauma treat-
ment clinic where she had previously received Prolonged Exposure therapy. In
her initial phone call, she stated that, although she liked the therapist who pro-
vided the exposure therapy, she disliked having to describe and listen to tapes
of her past traumatic memories and was interested in a psychotherapy that
focused on her current problems. Her PTSD symptoms were related to sexual
abuse at least several times per week from ages 7– 8 by stepbrothers who were
6– 7 years her senior. Her chief complaint: “I am having
a lot of the symptoms
I have had before, and I’m really depressed.”
On SCID and CAPS interviews, Deborah met
DSM- IV
criteria for chronic
PTSD. On the SCID she also met criteria for recurrent major depression,
but had no history of alcohol or substance abuse or dependence. She had no
personality disorder by SCID- II evaluation. For two months prior to her e-
valuation, Deborah reported worsening of dissociative symptoms, difficulty
falling asleep, nightmares, flashbacks, intense psychological and physical
distress when exposed
to reminders of her abuse, increased irritability, dif-
ficulty concentrating, hypervigilance, exaggerated startle response, and de-
pressed mood. She reported having experienced these symptoms in varying
degrees since childhood and that they had intensified after visiting her family
in Texas several months earlier. She reported
also feeling unhappy at work,
where her boss has been overly critical of her, and was in the process of look-
ing for a new job.