|
La Bretagne
[82 ILR 590] 903 n4, 933 n145
Lac Lanoux Arbitration (France/Spain) [24 ILR 101] 852 n35, 864, 883,
1017
Lafontant v. Aristide [103 ILR 581] 737
LaGrand Case (Germany v. United States) (Request for the Indication of
Provisional Measures) [118 ILR 37] 130, 135–6, 159, 220–1, 223,
773–4, 787 n53, 800–1, 802 n152, 823 n264, 933 n143, 938, 1071,
1094 n246, 1095–6, 1101 n292, 1102 n295, 1103
Laguna del Desierto (Argentina/Chile) case [113 ILR 1] 101 n124, 497
n50, 531 n248, 934, 936, 1048
Laker Airways v. Sabena 690, 692
Ex parte
Lam 169 n209
Lam Mow v. Nagle [4 AD 295] 662
Lamy case 806 n114
Land, Island and Maritime Frontier Dispute:
see
El Salvador/Honduras
(Land, Island and Maritime Frontier Dispute) [97 ILR 112]
Land Reclamation case [126 ILR 487] 1016 n24
Landano v. United States [116 ILR 534] 727
L¨ansman (Jlarkins)
et al.
v. Finland (Communication No. 671/1995)
[115 ILR 300] 296
Largueche v. Tancredi Fenu (Case No. 9321) [101 ILR 377] 766 n382
Larsen v. Hawaiian Kingdom [119 ILR 566] 1050, 1068 n75, 1079 n151
Latvian Constitutional Court’s Judgment on the Request for
Constitutional Review 173 n228
Lawless case:
see Re
O Laighl´eis (Lawless) [24 ILR 420]
Lawson v. Serco Ltd 653 n37
Lawyers for Human Rights v. Switzerland 394
LCB v. UK 358
‘Le Ski’ case [93 ILR 203] 173
Leasing West GmbH v. Algeria (Case No. 3 Ob 38/86) [116 ILR 526] 748
Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Request for an
Advisory Opinion by the United Nations General Assembly [110
ILR 163] 48 n16, 74 n14, 88, 99 n112, 104 n142, 109, 116–17, 124
n228, 212, 284 n108, 317 n284, 793, 852–3, 904 n7, 1017, 1066 n56,
1087, 1108–9, 1110, 1112, 1125, 1130, 1141, 1142, 1169 n7, 1170,
1181, 1184, 1187–8, 1307–8
Legality of the Use by a State of Nuclear Weapons in Armed Conflict
(Request by the World Health Organization for an Advisory
Opinion) [110 ILR 1] 1303–4, 1305 n102, 1306 n108
Legality of the Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. Belgium) 1093 n238, 1157
n199
lii
ta b l e o f c a s e s
Legality of the Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. Spain) 921, 1074
Legality of the Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. USA) 915, 921, 1074
Lehigh Valley Railroad Company v. State of Russia [4 AD 58] 485
LETCO (Liberian Eastern Timber Corporation) v. Liberia [89 ILR 313]
1042 n114
Letelier and Moffitt case [88 ILR 727] 100, 1021
Letelier and Others v. Republic of Chile and Linea Aerea Nacional-Chile
[63 ILR 378] 700–1, 727–8, 745 n262, 749–50
Levacher 174
Re
von Lewinski (called von Manstein) [16 AD 509] 443 n229
Liamco case (Libyan American Oil Company v. Libyan Arab Republic),
[62 ILR 140] 804 n166, 830, 833, 842
Libman v. The Queen [84 ILR 672] 655
Libra Bank Ltd v. Banco Nacional de Costa Rica [72 ILR 119] 742
Libya v. Rossbeton SRL (Case No. 2502) [87 ILR 63] 747
Libya/Chad, Territorial Dispute [100 ILR 1] 104, 123 n219, 200 n19, 496,
510 n123, 516, 522 n196, 526 n219, 528–9, 933 n342, 935–6, 969,
1011, 1075 n127, 1104
Libya/Malta, Continental Shelf case [81 ILR 238, 81 ILR 726] 74, 96 n99,
107, 583, 586 n147, 587, 596–7, 601 n241, 1089
Libya/Malta, Continental Shelf case (Application by Italy for Permission
to Intervene) [70 ILR 527] 1067, 1078, 1097–8, 1099 n277
Libyan American Oil Company (LIAMCO) v. Libya [62 ILR 140] 723
Libyan Arab Foreign Investment Company (LAFICO)/Republic of
Burundi (Dispute concerning the Libyan Arab–Burundi Holding
Company) [96 ILR 279] 796 n119
Licensing of Journalists case 388–9
Lichtensztejn case 321
Liechtenstein v. Germany 110, 1061 n21, 1067 n73, 1069 n78
Lighthouses Arbitration between France and Greece [6 AD 659] 1003–4
Lighthouses Arbitration between France and Greece, Claims No. 19 and
21 (Part) [23 ILR 352] 785 n42
Lighthouses Arbitration between France and Greece, Claim No. 27 [23
ILR 299] 836 n340
Ligue Internationale Contre le Racisme et l’Antis´emitisme 174 n235
Lilian Celiberti de Casariego v. Uruguay [68 ILR 41] 322
Linder and Others v. Portocarrero and Others [99 ILR 54] 160 n163,
162, 190
Lithgow case [75 ILR 438] 830 n299, 903 n4, 933–4, 935 n158
Litster v. Forth Dry Dock Engineering 157
ta b l e o f c a s e s
liii
Littlejohn, L, and Company Inc. v. United States [3 AD 483] 159 n157
Littrell v. United States (No. 2) [100 ILR 438] 149–50, 184, 713
Helen Liu v. Republic of China [101 ILR 519] 700 n14, 701
Loayza Tamayo v. Peru [116 ILR 338] 390, 801 n150
Lockerbie case (Questions of Interpretation and Application of the 1971
Montreal Convention arising from the Aerial Incident at
Lockerbie) (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya v. United Kingdom) (Request
for the Indication of Provisional Measures) [94 ILR 478] 114, 135,
654–5, 686, 927, 1065, 1067 n65, 1092 n234, 1094–5, 1114, 1236,
1268–70
Lockerbie case (Questions of Interpretation and Application of the 1971
Montreal Convention arising from the Aerial Incident at
Lockerbie) (Libyan Arab Jamarihiya v. United Kingdom)
(Preliminary Objections) [117 ILR 1] 1088
Loewen Group v. USA 1039 n174
Loizidou v. Turkey (Merits) [108 ILR 443] 236, 360, 523 n203, 782 n27,
829 n299
Loizidou v. Turkey (Preliminary Objections) [103 ILR 621] 236, 349–50,
354 n52, 448 n16, 658 n55, 790, 922–3, 935 n157, 937 n166, 938
Lonrho Exports Ltd v. Export Credits Guarantee Department [108 ILR
596] 149 n95, 150, 810
L ´opez Burgos v. Uruguay [68 ILR 29] 322
Lord Advocate’s Reference No. 1 of 2000 [122 ILR 619] 144, 146
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |
