Controlling irregular migration
Controlling irregular migration is a priority, especially after recent catastrophes
involving a large number of irregular migrants who died on their journey, or were subject
to inhuman conditions, shown explicitly in the media. These catastrophes are not the
responsibility of one particular ministry. According to the officials interviewed, the
responsibility is shared among different ministries, including Defence, Interior, Education
and Investment. In other words, it is a phenomenon affecting the whole of Egyptian
society. Therefore, it is extremely difficult for one or two ministries to handle the issue
since the roots of the problem are the responsibility of many ministries. The new project,
jointly implemented by the Ministry of Housing and New Urban Communities and the
Vocational Education and Training Reform Project (which follows the Ministry of Trade
and Industry), that will start training Egyptian labour in 20 different professions in the field
of construction using international criteria, will increase the chances of potential migrants
having legal working contracts in the EU. This type of project is of great importance,
provided that it is correctly implemented. However, making irregular migration harder, by
putting sanctions into the law against brokers, is being considered. Massive media
campaigns are also being undertaken among potential communities vulnerable to irregular
migration in order to raise their awareness of the risks associated with it. Border controls
are also being strengthened. The recent MME efforts, by opening up six new migration
information centres in different governorates, represent an effort that should be recognized
and replicated.
Related to the issue of irregular migration, the GOE considers the legalization of
irregular migration, already existing in EU countries, as a major challenge. As for
externalization of EU migration policy in this regard, the interviews revealed that the
Egyptian point of view is not against it, but only agrees on what is relevant and beneficial
to Egypt’s interests. For example, Egypt differed from Morocco in terms of the
readmission agreement signed with Italy; where Morocco accepted that all irregular
migrants from Morocco will return back there, Egypt agreed only to irregular migrants
who are Egyptians returning. Morocco also accepted joint security forces to secure their
borders, whereas Egypt viewed this as interference in its national sovereignty and only
agreed on training of Egyptian authorities and providing them with technical assistance
(e.g. Bio-metric technology to identify the nationality of irregular migrants).
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |