262 words
52
SAMPLE 38
Both governments and individuals are spending vast amounts of money
protecting animals and their habitats. This money could be better spent
dealing with fundamental issues in society such as poverty and healthcare.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The fights to protect animals and the fights against poverty and diseases are taking
place every day on every corner of the world. Nevertheless, how the governments
and individuals join in these fights depends greatly on the characteristics of the
area they are living. As far as I’m concerned, in some areas, the conservation of
animals and their home are costing residents and their government's huge amounts
of money and they should continue taking that step. While with the authorities and
individuals in other areas, urgent issues in society have priority over the
protection of endangered animals.
On the one hand, developing areas or nations are struggling with complicated
social problems such as poverty or healthcare and conserving wild animals and
their habitats are not the first priority. For example, suffering from poverty,
starvation, and diseases to death is extremely common in Africa. It is where
rainforests, the home of many animal species, are being destroyed are at an
alarming rate, which is primarily caused by the activities of the general
population. They rely heavily on wood as the major source of energy, cutting
down trees for heating and cooking. Residents there are not even meet their own
basic human needs, therefore can hardly bother conserving wild animals or their
habitats. Clearly, this fact requires the authorities to spend money solving pressing
problems in society first if they want to protect animals and the environment they
live in.
On the other hand, high income and developed countries, where issues such as
poverty and healthcare are no longer problems to their society, are giving a great
deal of money to the conservation of endangered animals and their habitats. Many
projects have been carried out, in which infrastructure and research are the two
most expensive. An example of this is the successful captive breeding program in
zoos, which cost a vast amount of money, has resulted in an increase in the
world’s panda population. As the problem of conserving endangered animals and
their home is getting more urgent, it is worth receiving more money.
In conclusion, I accept that the protection of animals and their habitats is receiving
53
huge amounts of money in some areas and it is reasonable to continue to give
money to it. While in other areas, pressing issues in society such as poverty and
healthcare are the first priorities.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |