273 words
108
SAMPLE 33
The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world costs numerous
governments’ expenditures. This money should be used in new housing and
road development. To what extent do you agree and disagree?
In recent years, governments have spent a great capital on solving housing
problems and the improvement of the transport system. While I agree that these
investments have brought a host of benefits to citizens, I believe that city planners
should allocate an acceptable proportion of public expenditure to rehabilitating
aged buildings.
There are various reasons why authorities should spend much money on
restructuring old buildings. Firstly, it is important to recognize that many
architectural styles have characterized cities, countries where they are located. In
fact, it is common that a variety of old buildings which have unique and traditional
values in architectural patterns have been integral parts, if not symbols of cities,
countries. In other words, modern buildings, which only serve the fundamental
function of providing shelters, cannot hold a candle to ancient buildings with
cultural heritages in them given that they are created by time. As another reason,
the existence of old buildings is of profoundly educational purpose. In certain
countries/nations, some old buildings, which are not famous for outstanding design
features, are well-known for their attachment/identity closely attached to either
historical events or religious factors, playing a critical role in education. As
witnesses, aged buildings reflect landmarks in the history or religion, which are
irreplaceable, should be transmitted through the generations.
On the other hand, these days, the migration to metropolises has gained currency in
many nations. Therefore, not only do governments face the need for housing but
also deal with transport issue. As a result of the mentioned problems, the
demolition of old buildings is reasonable and understandable. Singapore and
Hong Kong are telling examples for this. In such countries, providing appropriate
apartments and improving transport qualities are the most essential targets.
Besides, old buildings which are under the poor condition, low quality and
worthless should be knocked down to give spaces to the emergence of new ones
with higher safety and greater economic values.
In conclusion, only when old constructions bear special values in terms of culture
or history, should governments subsidize to maintain them. Otherwise, the urgent
109
issues as accommodation and transport development should be taken in priority.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |