129
2019 Vol. 31 No. 4
Series:
LITERARY CRITICISM
CONCLUSIONS AND CONSIDERATIONS
Problems of semantic tagging of the noun phrase category. Semantic tag – A
word-related semantic group, LSG, with a verbal commentary on the field [Grudeva
V.A., 2012; 112]. For each word category, it is natural that groups are different. The
first stage of the semantic tagging for the noun phrase series begins with the tag that
refers to the noun or related noun in the morphological labeling. For morphological
tags for all phrases, the label written on it serves as the basis for semantic tapping. So
some semantic tags are attached to the vocabulary in the previous step. Therefore, it
is desirable for the interface to be classified as semantic symbols of the word in the
“semantic sign of the word” window.
Known equestrian groups:
1) name of the person;
2) geographic name;
3) name of the organization, institution,
enterprise;
4) the name of the celestial lights;
5) the date or name of the holiday;
6) animal name;
7) product name;
8) The name of the divine concept.
A.Sobirov prefers to divide the semantic field of geographical names into the
following microdistrict [Sobirov A., 2001; 65]. In our view, the geographic name
spiritual group can be subdivided into such an internal LMG:
1. Landscape: plain (a); hill (b); mountain (d); Desert, Desert Names (c).
2. Water names (hydronymes): spring, pool name (a); , stream, river name (sew-
age) (b); lake, sea, ocean name (turbulent waters) (c). The linguistic model of se-
mantic tagging consists of typing a microfilm, LMT, or LMG number after
a tag on a
morphological tag.
During the semantic tagging of a particular noun, it is possible to attach a sepa-
rate tag to the toponyms. For other groups of nouns, the interpretation of the morpho-
logical tag is sufficient because they cannot belong to any other LMG or semantic
field except for the labels on the morphological tag. The semantic labeling of a famous
noun: Saturn's
[noun], [at. noun.], [TL].
In morphological touches, the related noun spiritual group is divided into a clear
and abstract noun. The real horse is divided into the following LMT [Sayfullaeva R.
2009; 221]:
1)
the name of the item;
2) Name of the person:
a) LMG that describes a person in terms of kinship;
b) LMG, which characterizes a person by age;
c) LMG that characterizes a person professionally;
d) LMG that
characterize a person by sex;
e) LMG characterizing a person in terms of residence;
f) LMG characterizing a person in terms of rank;
130
Series: LITERARY CRITICISM
2019 Vol. 30 No. 3
d) LMG characterizing a person's social status;
3) the name of the item;
4) plant name;
5) place name;
6) the name of the quantity;
7) name of organization,
institution;
8) name from time to time;
9) activity-process name.
A.Sobirov argues that the “lithosphere” can form a separate lexical-semantic
group together with terms such as the Earth's core, crust, earthquake, soil, solid rock,
minerals, ore. ., 2001; 92] and classifies this LSG as follows:
1. Combustible minerals: coal, natural gas, oil, peat.
2. Ore minerals:
a) ferrous metals: magnetic iron, brown iron, red iron (all three are made of
iron, steel, cast iron);
b) Non-ferrous metals: gold, silver, copper, zinc, lead, aluminum.
3. Non-metallic minerals: salt salt, sulfur, limestone, marble, granite.
Therefore, the substance can be classified into the following LMGs:
For the full and comprehensive use of semantic touches, it is necessary to rely
on the classification of semantic field theory, classification [10] created by A.Sobirov.
In addition to the description of the LMG attributed to the tag at the morphological
tagging stage, the semantic field status is also noted for the noun category. The use of
semantic field theory in the system of corpus labels is the basis for the creation of a
system of corpus-tags.
Sobirov argues that the concept of the universe is divided into 20 large pieces,
based on F. Dornzeif's opinion [A., 2001; 36]:
131
2019 Vol. 31 No. 4
Series: LITERARY CRITICISM
1
Inanimate nature. Items.
The concept of the universe is a macromolecular
classification
2
Plants, Animals. Human (living organism).
3
Space. The spatial state. Fig.
4
Size. Relationships. The reason.
5
Time.
6
World. Color. Sound. Temperature. Weight.
7
Status. The smell. Tasting (external and external reception).
8
Movement.
9
Desire and Will.
10
Feeling.
11
Emotions. Jazawa (excitement). Characteristics Edges.
12
Thinking.
13
Symbol. Information. Language.
14
Record. Knowledge (science).
15
Art.
16
Society and social relations.
17
Equipment. Technique.
18
Agriculture.
19
Law. Ethics.
20
Religion. Supernatural.
According to A.Sobirov, the chapter “Divinity and Heavenly Bodies” by R. Hal-
lig and V. Wartburg can be divided into at least 4-5 semantic fields in Uzbek [Sabirov
A., 2001; 55].
Classification of “Theology and celestial bodies”
1.
Allah, the names
that represent
the concept of a
micromanage is a
grain
.
2.
The semantic
domain
of words
expressing
religious under-
standing.
3.
Cosmo
things.
The semantic
vertical area of
the words about
the
concept of
weather, wind
.
4.
A micro-
manage
representing
the notion of
Islam
.
5.
Area of
concepts
related
to other
religions
In the Russian-Uzbek thematic dictionary (Russian-Uzbek thematic dictionary)
published in 1975, the world is divided into three parts [Tikhonov A.N., 1975; 193-450]:
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: 
