34
hostile to each one. Bukhara and Khiva were rivals to each other because of their
disputable claims upon Merv and the left bank of the lower Syr Darya. Besides, there
was rivalry and dispute between Bukhara and Kokand because of Bukhara’s
intervention in districts of Djizak, Ura-Tube, Khodjakent, Tashkent and Turkestan
.
78
Bukhara invaded the Fergana Valley in 1839-1842 and in 1863 thus reduced Kokand
into a status of vassal. The conflicts between two khanates
continued until Russia
entered the region
79
.
Instead of uniting against a common enemy, the khanates
sought ways to benefit from a high power’s attacks on one another. “The enduring
rivalries among the Central Asian khanates prevented the formation of a united front
against the Russian invader, and Bukhara’s involvement in Kokand’s internal affairs
became the immediate cause of Bukhara’s conflict with Russia”.
80
The Emir of
Bukhara Muzaffar al Din preferred gaining advantages from
the Russian attacks on
Kokand by invading Kokand’s territories together with Russia. While Russian
General Mikhail Grigoryevich Charniev
81
had a war with Kokand and went over to
capture Tashkent, Emir Muzaffar al Din attacked Kokand Khanate and captured the
cities of Ura Turbe, Djizak(Jizzakh), Katta Qorghan and Khodjent. This was the
breaking point between Russia and Bukhara. The Bukharan emir’s invasion of the
Kokand Khanate angered Russia. Russia punished Bukhara with the suspension of its
trade.
For Russia, territorial gain was not important; however it was very cautious
about the strengthening of an actor at the expense of another in the region
.
82
The
Bukharan Emir followed wrong policies regarding Kokand against the Russian
78
Becker, Seymour,
Russia’s Protectorates in Central Asia: Bukhara and Khiva, 1865–1924
,(London
&New York:Routledge Curzon,2005), 4.
79
Ibid, 4.
80
Ibid, 4.
81
General Mikhail Grigoryevich Charniev was the military governor of Turkestan Oblast between
1865-1867. During the Charniev, Turkestan was an oblast dependent
on Orenburg Governorate-
General, not a separate Governor Generalship.
82
Becker, Seymour,
Russia’s Protectorates in Central Asia: Bukhara and Khiva, 1865–1924
,(London
&New York:Routledge Curzon,2005),22.
35
interests. Russia replied to acts of Bukharan emir Muzaffar al Din by occupying
Samarkand in 1868. Emir’s army could not stand against the powerful and
modernized Russian troops. In the wars between Russia and Bukhara, Russia only
lost very few soldiers although Bukhara’s numerous
troops were killed and many
thousands were wounded. The arithmetic imbalance in terms of killed and wounded
troops between Russia and Bukhara was extremely high. It was clearly impossible to
resist by Bukhara against a technological and technical superiority of Russian troops.
“Bukhara emerged from the war of 1865-1868 in full possession of her legal
sovereignty but a de facto dependency of the Russian empire”.
83
With the treaty of
1868, Bukhara had to accept the protectorate under Russian rule and annexation of
Samarkand to Turkestan Guberniia under Russian rule. “The peace treaty, signed on
June 30, 1868, gave Russia all the conquered territories: Khojand, Ura Tube, Jizzakh,
Katta Qorghan, and especially Samarkand, which controlled the headwaters of the
Zarafshan (all Bukhara’s water),
and finally, all the commercial advantages which
the Russian leaders had previously been unable to obtain. Bukhara became a state
under Russian suzerainty”
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: