Research Methods in Tourism, Hospitality and Events Management



Download 2,07 Mb.
Pdf ko'rish
bet88/97
Sana31.12.2021
Hajmi2,07 Mb.
#212762
1   ...   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   ...   97
Bog'liq
Research methoda in tourism, hospitality and events management 72

6.5.4 Focus groups

Focus groups involve a recorded discussion of perhaps 5–10 people who

share a common interest (such as having undertaken the same holiday).

Open questions are asked of the group and the interviewer acts as a

discussion leader. The main functions, other than those of the leader, are to

ensure that the discussion does not stray from the topic in hand by

occasionally prompting, and to ensure that all members have an equal

opportunity to speak.

Focus groups are useful to gain an understanding of why particular

behaviour occurred. In tourism, this can be most useful in finding out what

motivates travel to particular destinations. Information collected in this way

is often detailed and lengthy. Thus, focus groups interviews are particularly

valuable in the exploratory stages of research or to provide qualitative

information alongside a quantitative survey. When developing the focus

group method, the following list provides some practical considerations:

1. The leader must have thorough training and experience.

2. The location must be appropriate for the respondents who will make

up the group. Thus, a back room of a public house, hotel or church hall

might be suitable for resort guest house owners, marketing managers

of airlines and touring caravan owners, respectively. You can also use a

room in your college or university to carry out focus groups.

3. Number of respondents: 5–10 is ideal as larger than this may be

unmanageable in terms of letting everyone have an equal input.



4. Timing: to ensure a respectable response rate, select a time when

respondents are most likely to be available.

5. Recording: tape recording is easiest but video recording may provide

additional insights into the dynamics of the group. The main

consideration is that the recording equipment must be quiet and

unobtrusive.

6. Respondent type: respondents should share a common interest related

to the topic of the research. There should be balance within the group

in terms of gender, age or other characteristics (e.g. buying behaviour).

Some groups may be made up of particular types (e.g. all male) but

effort should be made to avoid a single individual differing

significantly in some way from the rest of the group. If possible,

respondents should not know each other or have had previous

experience of this type of research.

7. Refreshments: when respondents arrive, they should be welcomed and

helped to relax. Refreshments can be served and respondents can get to

know each other informally.

8. Questions: the leader opens the discussion with some general questions

and an explanation of how the discussion will be run. From this point

on, the leader takes a ‘back seat’ role unless:

one person dominates the discussion (must be suppressed)

a respondent is not taking part (question should be specifically

directed)

a respondent is aggressive/unhelpful (reason for aggression

probed and encouraged to participate positively).

9. Silences: these can be embarrassing, but the leader should resist

stepping in unless absolutely necessary. Pauses can prompt

respondents to become involved with comments that have been

carefully thought out.

Overall, focus groups can yield large amounts of valuable qualitative data.

The results come not only from what was said by members of the group but

also from the interaction within the group. Where it is important to

investigate the reason for behaviour, group interviews can be most useful,

especially in the exploratory stages of the project.

There are practical issues associated with conducting focus groups,

particularly when the time set aside for the research is limited and

respondents are difficult to find. Emma, who conducted her undergraduate



research last year into the effect of branding on the millennial event

attendee, planned to do her research using focus groups of students at the

university. We can see the issues that she had during her organisation of

these sessions in 

Illustration 6.4

. Despite these issues, the research was

successfully completed and the findings were very interesting.

Illustration 6.4 Practical issues associated with the organisation

of focus groups

The process of data collection was simple in nature and for the

size of the sample it worked most effectively compared to other

data collection processes. However, problems arose when trying

to find participants to take part in the focus groups. Due to the

time of year, students were very busy with exams and work,

therefore many could not spare the time. Although an initial

setback, the sample of participants that attended provided

satisfying responses to the research question. Within each of the

focus groups, there was always one person that was more vocal

than the others (such as Lily, Harry, Alice, Ella, Hazel and

Finn). Focus group 3 was particularly bad for participation and

contribution, although this could be associated with the IT

equipment failure early on, which meant that the running order

of the session had to change slightly. However, the focus group

lacked the momentum after the equipment was fixed, therefore it

could be related to the participants in the group. This contradicts

previous literature by Barrows (2000), who said that smaller

focus groups allow you to drill deeper and attain more in-depth

insights, although this was only isolated to this group. From the

results and the quality of data collected, a smaller group of four

people (Focus group 5), rather than a large group (Focus group

1), allowed the participants to go into more detail about their

experiences and opinions.




Source: ‘The significance of brand design and colour on

event purchase and participation amongst Generation Y’ by

Emma Macphie, final-year project, supervised by Susan

Horner, Plymouth University, 2016.

Another issue was finding male participants for the focus

groups; however, the males that took part in the groups seemed

to have similar views to the female participants, therefore the

author questions whether the responses differ much between

men and women. 

Table 6.3

 indicates who attended each group

and how many attended per group.




Download 2,07 Mb.

Do'stlaringiz bilan baham:
1   ...   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   ...   97




Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©hozir.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling

kiriting | ro'yxatdan o'tish
    Bosh sahifa
юртда тантана
Боғда битган
Бугун юртда
Эшитганлар жилманглар
Эшитмадим деманглар
битган бодомлар
Yangiariq tumani
qitish marakazi
Raqamli texnologiyalar
ilishida muhokamadan
tasdiqqa tavsiya
tavsiya etilgan
iqtisodiyot kafedrasi
steiermarkischen landesregierung
asarlaringizni yuboring
o'zingizning asarlaringizni
Iltimos faqat
faqat o'zingizning
steierm rkischen
landesregierung fachabteilung
rkischen landesregierung
hamshira loyihasi
loyihasi mavsum
faolyatining oqibatlari
asosiy adabiyotlar
fakulteti ahborot
ahborot havfsizligi
havfsizligi kafedrasi
fanidan bo’yicha
fakulteti iqtisodiyot
boshqaruv fakulteti
chiqarishda boshqaruv
ishlab chiqarishda
iqtisodiyot fakultet
multiservis tarmoqlari
fanidan asosiy
Uzbek fanidan
mavzulari potok
asosidagi multiservis
'aliyyil a'ziym
billahil 'aliyyil
illaa billahil
quvvata illaa
falah' deganida
Kompyuter savodxonligi
bo’yicha mustaqil
'alal falah'
Hayya 'alal
'alas soloh
Hayya 'alas
mavsum boyicha


yuklab olish