Limitations
Even though quasi-experimental research methods were employed in this research,
several limitations and concerns are still present. A limiting factor of these results is the younger
and higher income makeup of this sample. The generalizability of these findings are therefore
reduced and not as broad as some historical literature, which has utilized a larger, more
representative dataset of the population. However, the combined sample of 102 was adequate to
provide the needed data for statistically valid analysis and is comparable to several smaller
studies of financial education.
Another limitation is that the sample of employees was from two financial industry
employers. The skills, experience, and education levels required for their specific industry
resulted in the higher levels of initial financial knowledge of both participant and control groups.
These concerns were addressed through use of the control group, which allowed the actual
change resulting from the program treatment to be isolated. However, valid concerns can still be
raised as to the effectiveness of the educational program for less educated and financially literate
participants.
The financial education program was available to all employees and those who self-
selected into the program were similar to the control group. However, there is still a self-
selection bias concern among the participant group. Consistent with the theoretical framework
for this research, adult learning theory supports the search for knowledge as a part of the
constructivist view of learning, therefore the participant’s self-selecting behavior can be
92
explained as the desire to seek knowledge. The resulting significant changes in financial
satisfaction of the participant group as compared to those of the control group provide additional
support for the effectiveness of the educational program and the delivery using the constructivist
approach. However, a study by Meier and Sprenger (2013) suggested that time perspective and
an individual’s time preference may explain who will or will not decide to become financially
literate through financial education programs. Further research is needed to properly assess if the
desire to seek financial education is a factor for change in financial satisfaction, versus
mandatory participation.
There may also be concerns about the selection of the control group. Attempts were made
by the employer program administrators to select control group members who resembled
participants. A randomly selected assignment of both participant and control groups would have
been preferred. However, the educational program was offered as an employee benefit requiring
a small fee for participation, and therefore random selection and assignment was not possible.
Lastly, the influence of the program facilitator as a contributing factor in the results exists
as a possible concern. Facilitator bias to focus on certain key topics of assessment interest, which
could potentially impact the results, is a valid concern. However, there must also be recognition
of the consistency of program delivery. Critical cognitive learning assimilation of the
constructivist view of adult learning theory required special skills, knowledge, and understanding
for program facilitation. Therefore, concerns related to the influence of the facilitator should be
taken into account as both potentially positive and negative factors. The alternative of having
more than one instructor adds potential variability of delivery and concerns as to consistency of
content covered. Testing several instructors as an added variable would have provided greater
93
validity. However, the resources and number of employer groups necessary to accomplish this
was beyond the scope of this study.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |