Jadam organic Farming & Gardening : The Way to Ultra-Low-Cost Agriculture, Make All-Natural Fertilizer, Pesticide and Microorganism Inputs Yourself

bad
? Who started teaching that bad smell
means putrefaction and putrefaction is
bad
? is nonsensical idea and fostering
of it is an important reason behind the fall of our traditional organic farming. If
smell was not labeled problematic we would still be making and using liquid
fertilizer as our ancestors had been doing. We would be 100% self-sufficient in
liquid fertilizer. Leaf mold would still be used as an important source of mi-
croorganisms. Since smell became evil, the farmers who toiled with smell were
labeled unhygienic, uncivilized and dirty people. ese farmers fell from favor
and so did the system of our traditional organic agriculture. e “experts”
taught us that fermentation is good and putrefaction is bad. is thought has
ULC영어본문.qxp_레이아웃 1 2016. 2. 19. 오후 6:40 페이지 140

---

gained such a strong support that all farmers seem to believe in it. But I cannot
assert enough: this is all a scam. ere is no science that backs the claim that
fermentation is good and putrefaction is bad. 
Is putrefaction bad? What would happen without it? Dead animal and
plant bodies would not go back to the soil. at putrefaction produces harmful
toxins is an egregious insult against the work of nature. Without putrefaction
there is no puriication; putrefaction is puriication. It is because things rot that
they are cleaned. Do not judge the grandeur of nature with limited human ca-
pacity. Judging a farming input based on smell is not scientiic and is a com-
plete misreading of nature. Why did this concept come to be? Who spread it
and who beneited from the propaganda? Who became the losers? e answers
are quite obvious. Farmers lost their ability to self-produce the inputs they
needed for farming, and lost money because they now have to buy factory-
made inputs. Microorganisms have become an important