(Temple of Preah Vihear, Judgement, ICJ Reports 1962, p .6). 7
II. Xalqaro huquqning asosiy prinsiplari. Xalqaro huquq normalarining ichki huquq normalaridan ustuvorligi tamoyili: 1872-yil 14-sentabrdagi Alabama ishi. 14
(The Alabama Arbitration Arbitral Award, in J. B. Moore, History and Digest of the International Arbitrations to Which the United States Has Been a Party, Vol. 1 (1898), p. 495. 14
III. Xalqaro huquq subyektlari. Davlatlarning tashkil topishi va tugatilishi. Yevropa Ittifoqining Yugoslaviya ishlari bo‘yicha konferensiyasi, 1992-yil 4-iyuldagi arbitraj komissiyasining 8-xulosasi. (Arbitration Comission, EC Conference on Yugoslavia, Opinion No 8, ILR, Vol.92, p. 199.) 23
IV. Xalqaro huquqda yurisdiksiya masalalari. Davlat suvereniteti va yurisdiksiya masalalari: 1923-yil 17-avgustdagi Uimbldon ishi. (Affaire du Vapeur “Wimbledon”, Arret, 1923, CPJI serie A No 1, p.15) 31
V. Xalqaro huquqning prinsiplari va yurisdiksiya. O‘zbekiston va Metal-Tech ishi 2013-yil. 37
Metal-Tech Ltd. v Republic of Uzbekistan (ICSID Case No. ARB/10/3). 38
Tamar Meshel. Metal-Tech Ltd. v. Republic of Uzbekistan – Is Really No One Getting Punished? http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2014/01/03 . 43
VI. Xalqaro huquqda hudud masalalari. Davlat chegaralarining belgilanishi – Benin va Niger o‘rtasidagi chegara nizosi (Frontier Dispute, International Court of Justice Reports 2005,90 (12 July 2005) 46
VII. Xalqaro shartnomalar huquqi. Xalqaro shartnoma normalarini sharhlash: “Liviya va Chad o‘rtasidagi hududiy mojaro” Xalqaro Sud 1994-yil 3-fevral. ICJ, Territorial Dispute (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya/Chad) 54
VIII. Xalqaro tashkilotlar huquqi. BMT xizmatini amalga oshirishda ko‘rilgan zararlar uchun kompensatsiya to‘lash bo‘yicha nizo, Xalqaro Sudning konsultativ xulosasi, 1949-yil. (Reparation for Injuries Suffered in the Service of the United Nations, Advisory Opinion: ICJ Reports 1949, p.174) 62
IX. Xalqaro-huquqiy javobgarlik. Amerika Qo‘shma Shtatlarining Tehrondagi diplomatik va konsullik vakillari bo’yicha Xalqaro Sud qarori 1980-yil 24-may. (United States Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran, Judgement, ICJ Reports 1980, p.3) 69
X. Xalqaro gumanitar huquq. Kuch ishlatish va jamoaviy o‘zini-o‘zi himoya qilish yuzasidan Nikaragua va AQSH o‘rtasidagi nizo, 1986 yil, BMT Xalqaro Sudi qarori (Case Concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America), Judgment (Merits), ICJ Reports 1986, p.14). 78
XI. Xalqaro iqtisodiy huquqi. Investitsiya qabul qiluvchi mezbon davlatning majburiyatlari – Saluka ishi, Ad hoc arbitraj sudi 2006-yil 17-mart. (Saluka investments vs Czech Republic 17. 03. 2006). 86
XII. Xalqaro investitsiya huquqi. Eng ko‘p qulaylik tug‘diruvchi rejimning mohiyati – Avgustin Maffezini ishi. 2000-yil 25-yanvar. (Emilio Augustin Maffezini v. The Kingdom of Spain (ICSID Case No. ARB/97/7. 25.01.2000) 94
XIII. Xalqaro jinoyat huquqi va inson huquqlari. Jinoyat sodir etgan shaxslarning topshirilishi va o‘lim jazosiga oid Sooring ishi. (Soering Case, Judgement, ECHR, Series A, No.161, p.1) 105
XIV. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi xalqaro huquqning teng huquqli subyekti sifatida. O‘zbekiston va Oxus Gold ishi 2015-yil 17-dekabr. (Oxus Gold Plc v The Republic of Uzbekistan, UNCITRAL 2010 Rules 17 December, 2015). 113
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |