Group: 6-2 ing 16 Student: Qurbonova Yulduz Analyses of websites

Group: 6-2 ing 16

Student: Qurbonova Yulduz

Analyses of websites

1. 
   https://www.educationmattersmag.com
   

1. 
   Currency: the date of updating is not given on the site;
   
2. 
   Audience: the content can be an effective source for teachers and primary leaders for teaching writing;
   
3. 
   Authority: Professor Andrew J.Martin and Dr Rebecca J.Collie/School of Education, University of New South Wales, Australia;
   
4. 
   Accuracy: In my perspective, the article is in an accurate form, since paragraphs are given, subtopics are introduced, some keywords are highlightened;
   
5. 
   Objectivity: there are some advertisements on different topics, some of them are related to education, while others do not get the moral points. Besides, several educational articles are provided.
   

2. 
   https://www.researchgate.net
   

1. 
   Currency: September, 2017. ( 8780 view)
   
2. 
   Audience: teachers, students, researchers;
   
3. 
   Authority: Fatemah Ghani Dehkordi/Bushehr University of Medical Sciences
   
4. 
   Accuracy: Level of accuracy is high. Because, personally, I often use this source and have never regretted about choosing it. The content is in order. Format is well-organized. Footnotes, publication info are given on each page.
   
5. 
   Objectivity: I have not met with any advertisement. As soon as I clicked on the link it started to be downloaded in full version.
   

3. 
   https://www.ro.eco.edu.au/ajte
   

1. 
   Currency: 2018
   
2. 
   Audience: anyone who wants to have an idea about the topic;
   
3. 
   Authority: Yin Ling Cheung/Nanyang Technological University, Singapore;
   
4. 
   Accuracy: Accuracy is good. Information is easy to catch at first sight. Charts, tables are provided in a good format;
   
5. 
   Objectivity: there is no advertisement, but only the related information and article.
   

4. 
   https://curriculum.eleducation.org
   

1. 
   Currency: no date is provided;
   
2. 
   Audience: teachers, guides, students, volunteers on educational fields;
   
3. 
   Authority: author’s name is not given.
   
4. 
   Accuracy: I cannot find it very well. It is somehow awkward, however, the content seems meaningful;
   
5. 
   Objectivity: advertisement is given. A number of articles are added to show off the audience, such as on labs, technology, multimedia and lesson plans.
   

5. 
   https://www.education.alberta.ca
   

1. 
   Currency: not given;
   
2. 
   Audience: teachers, parents, young leaders, early childhood professionals;
   
3. 
   Authority: Alberta Education.
   
4. 
   Accuracy: probably, it is good. Because the paragraphs are in a form of question and the answer, pictures and illustrations are provided. The format orders are followed.
   
5. 
   Objectivity: no advertisement. Only related information is given. There is not any extra/out of topic stuffs.