From Content Knowledge to
GMAT Problems
Dear Jen,
I feel like I understand everything in class (or I feel like I understand everything
I read when studying for the GMAT), but then when I actually take the test, I
get almost everything wrong and I'm scoring really low. What's going on?
Confused in Conshohocken
Dear Confused,
There are two things that occur to me here. One is that you mention “understanding” every
thing when you study or attend class— and not that you are
doing the related problems success
fully, in two minutes each, during class or anytime. When I watch Serena Williams play tennis,
I
understand exactly what’s happening— but that certainly doesn’t mean I could execute it on
the court.
O f course, understanding the material is important, but
doing the material— regularly, the way
you would physically practice for a sport—is the other half of that.
Make sure that when you review your class notes, you actually pull out a
timer and do the
problems in your notes, even though you already know what the answer will be. If you are do
ing an
Official Guide problem (just a reminder: you should always be doing those with a timer)
and you get it wrong, you take more than two minutes, or it just feels weird, then put it on a
list of problems to review, or make a flash card.
I like making flash cards because when you pick up a flash card, it is really obvious that you are
supposed to
do something. (Specifically, you’re supposed to re-do the problem in two minutes or
less.) Conversely, when people look over their notes, they just tend to nod and turn the pages.
Before taking the real GMAT, you should have done
(done, not
looked at) every problem in the
Official Guide. A good goal is being able to execute each one within the time limit, and then
Chapter 6
From Content Knowledge to GMAT Problems
being able to explain it to someone else. After mastering a problem, ask yourself how it could’ve
been different (because you won’t see those exact problems on the GMAT; you’ll see “similar
but different” problems). For instance: What if the rate, rather than the distance, had been
unknown? What if the Data Sufficiency problem had specified that x was positive? What if the
400 were a 100 instead? If someone reached in and changed the problem around in ways like
those I’m describing, could you still do it?
What I’m getting at
here is a level of deep interaction with a problem. You could say that
understanding is the first level, followed by being able to execute it, then being able to execute
it within the time limit, being able to teach it to someone else, and finally being able to apply
what you’ve learned to a body of “similar but different” problems.
That should give you some ideas for studying (actually, “practicing”) more actively.
Jennifer Dziura, M GM AT Instructor, New York
Download
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: