Shareholders
Mutual Fund
Board of Directors
Oversees the fund’s activities, including approval of the contract with
the management company and certain other service providers
Investment
Adviser
Manages the
fund’s portfolio
according to
the objectives
and policies
described in
the fund’s
prospectus.
Principal
Underwriter
Sells fund
shares either
directly to
the public or
through other
firms (e.g.
broker dealers).
Independent
Public
Accountant
Certifies the
fund’s
financial
statements.
Administrator
Oversees
performance of
other companies
that provide
services to the
fund and ensures
that the fund’s
operations comply
with applicable
federal
requirements.
Transfer Agent
Executes
shareholder
transactions,
maintains records
of transactions and
other shareholder
account activity,
and sends account
statements and
other documents
to shareholders.
Custodian
Holds the
fund’s assets,
maintaining
them
separately
to protect
shareholder
interests and
reconciling the
fund’s holdings
against the
custodian’s
records.
F I G U R E 2 0 . 3
The Organizational Structure of a Mutual Fund
Source: Investment Company Institute, 2010 Investment Company Fact Book, 50th Ed. (Washington DC: ICI). Reprinted
with permission.
In addition to the investment advisors, the fund will contract with other firms
to provide additional services. These will include underwriters, transfer agents, and
custodians. Contracts will also be arranged with an independent public accountant.
Large funds may arrange for some of these functions to be done in-house, whereas
other funds will use all outside companies. Figure 20.3 shows the organizational struc-
ture of a mutual fund.
Investment Objective Classes
Four primary classes of mutual funds are available to investors. They are (1) stock
funds (also called equity funds), (2) bond funds, (3) hybrid funds, and (4) money
market funds. Figure 20.4 shows the distribution of assets among these types of
funds. The largest class is the equity funds, followed by the money market, bond, and
hybrid funds.
Equity Funds
Equity funds share a common theme in that they all invest in stock. After that, they
can have very different objectives. The three classes reported by the Investment
Company Institute are capital appreciation funds, world funds, and total return funds.
Capital appreciation funds are the largest, with about 39% of all mutual fund assets.
These funds seek rapid capital appreciation (increases in share prices) and are not
concerned with dividends. Many of these funds are relatively risky in that the fund
managers are attempting to select companies incurring rapid growth. For example,
many capital appreciation mutual funds invested heavily in high technology and
Internet stocks during the 1990s.
Total return funds represent about 28% of total mutual fund assets. The goal
of these funds is to seek a combination of current income and capital appreciation.
They will include both mature firms that are paying dividends and growth companies
that are expected to post large stock price increases. Total return funds are expected
to be less risky than capital appreciation funds since they will include more large
established firms. This was borne out in 2000 when capital appreciation funds lost
16.5% of their assets and total return funds only lost 5.7%.
World equity funds invest primarily in stocks of foreign companies. These funds
allow investors easy access to international diversification. Many financial planners
recommend that investors hold at least a small portion of their investments in foreign
stocks. These world funds provide the primary vehicle.
Chapter 20 The Mutual Fund Industry
497
Equity
$4.96 Trillion
45%
Money Market
$3.32 Trillion
29%
Bond Funds
$2.21 Trillion
20%
Hybrid
$640.75 Billion
6%
F I G U R E 2 0 . 4
Distribution of Assets Among Types of Mutual Funds
Data Source: Investment Company Institute, 2010 Investment Company Fact Book, 50th ed. (Washington,
DC: ICI), p. 126.
www.icifactbook.org/index.html
.
498
Part 6 The Financial Institutions Industry
State Municipal
$1.071 Trillion
20%
Government
$803 Billion
15%
Strategic Income
$1.001 Trillion
18%
National Municipal
$679 Billion
13%
Corporate
$868 Billion
16%
World
$419 Billion
8%
High Yield
$571 Billion
10%
F I G U R E 2 0 . 5
Assets Invested in Different Types of Bond Mutual Funds
Data Source: Investment Company Institute, 2010 Investment Company Fact Book, 50th ed. (Washington, DC: ICI),
p. 131.
www.icifactbook.org/index.html
.
The three types of equity funds presented here oversimplify the range of stock
mutual funds available to investors. For example, the Vanguard family of mutual funds
offers 62 different stock funds. Each one differs in its stated goals. Some hold stock
from specific industries; others hold stock with certain historical growth rates. Others
are chosen by their PE ratio. Mutual fund companies try to offer a fund that will
appeal to every investor’s needs.
Bond Funds
Figure 20.5 shows the major types of bond funds tracked by the Investment Company
Institute. Strategic income bonds are the most popular and invest in a combination
of U.S. corporate bonds to provide a high level of current income. The quality of the
bonds in these funds will often be lower than in some other classes, but their yields
will be higher. Investors are trading safety for greater returns. Corporate bond funds,
the next most popular fund type, invest primarily in high-grade corporate bonds.
Government bonds are also popular. These are essentially default risk-free, but will
have relatively low returns. The state and national municipal (muni) bonds are tax-free.
Bonds are not as risky as stocks, and so it is not usually as important that
investors diversify across a large number of different bonds. Additionally, it is rela-
tively easy to buy and sell bonds through the secondary market. As a result, it is
not surprising that bond mutual funds hold only about a third of the assets held by
stock mutual funds. Still, many investors value the liquidity intervention and auto-
matic reinvestment features provided by bond mutual funds.
Hybrid Funds
Hybrid funds combine stocks and bonds into one fund. The idea is to provide an invest-
ment that diversifies across different types of securities as well as across different
issuers of a particular type of security. Thus, if an investor found a hybrid fund that
held the percentage of stocks and bonds he wanted, he could own just one fund
instead of several. Despite this apparent convenience, most investors still prefer to
choose separate funds. Only about 5% of all mutual fund accounts are hybrid accounts.
Chapter 20 The Mutual Fund Industry
499
Money Market Funds
Money market mutual funds (MMMFs) have existed since the early 1970s; however,
the low market interest rates before 1977 (which were either below or just slightly
above the Regulation Q ceiling of 5.25% to 5.5%) kept them from being particularly
advantageous relative to bank deposits. In 1978, Merrill Lynch recognized that it could
provide better service to its customers if it offered an account that customers could
use to warehouse money. Prior to the introduction of MMMFs as a small-investor
account, customers had to bring in checks to the brokerage house when they wanted
to invest and had to pick up checks when they sold securities. Customers who had
MMMF accounts, however, could simply direct the broker to take funds out of this
account to buy stocks or to deposit funds in this account when they sold securities.
Initially, Merrill Lynch did not look on the MMMF as a major source of income.
In the early 1980s, inflation and interest rates skyrocketed. Regulation Q
restricted banks from paying more than 5.25% in interest on savings accounts. With
interest rates in the money markets exceeding 15%, investors flocked to MMMFs.
Figure 20.6 shows the growth of MMMFs since 1975.
All MMMFs are open-end investment funds that invest only in money market
securities. Most funds do not charge investors any fee for purchasing or redeeming
shares. The funds usually have a minimum initial investment of $500 to $2,000. The
funds’ yields depend entirely on the performance of the securities purchased.
An important feature of MMMFs is that many have check-writing privileges. They
often do not charge a fee for writing checks or have any minimum check amount
as long as the balance in the account is above the stated level. This convenience, along
with market interest rates, makes the accounts very popular with small investors.
Investors often take their money out of federally insured banks and thrifts and put
it into uninsured MMMFs. An important question is why they are so willing to take this
extra level of risk. The reason is that the extra risk has historically been really very
small. The money invested in MMMFs is in turn invested in money market instruments.
Commercial paper and certificates of deposit are by far the largest component of these
funds, followed by U.S. Treasury securities and repurchase agreements. Figure 20.7
shows the distribution of money market fund assets. Because the risk of default on
these securities was thought to be very low, the risk of MMMFs was considered very
low. Investors recognized this and so were willing to abandon the safety of banks for
higher returns.
This confidence was shaken during the credit crisis when there was a short
period when mutual funds were unable to redeem their holdings of commercial paper.
Even though commercial paper is short-term and issued by typically strong compa-
nies, the near panic situation in the markets caused the market for these securities
to evaporate. The day after Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc., declared bankruptcy
on September 15, 2008, the Reserve Primary Fund “broke the Buck” by failing to
redeem money market accounts at the $1.00 NAV. This initiated a run around the
world on money market funds with rapid withdrawals threatening the liquidity of hun-
dreds of other funds. Two days later the Treasury announced a Temporary Guarantee
Program for money market funds, and the Fed agreed to finance the purchase of
asset-backed commercial paper from money market funds. The effect of these actions
restored confidence and by October of 2008, investors had added $149 billion in
new cash. This trend continued such that by January 2009, total assets in MMMFs
were nearly $4 trillion, their highest level up to that date. Investors were moving
out of stock, bond, and hybrid funds to the safety of the money market account.
Access the most recent
statistics on the net assets
of money market mutual
funds at
www.ici.org
.
G O O N L I N E
500
Part 6 The Financial Institutions Industry
Index Funds
A special kind of mutual fund that does not fit any of the classes discussed previously,
yet which represents an alternative investment style, is the index fund. Traditional
funds employ investment managers who select stocks and bonds for the fund’s port-
folio. If we believe the lessons about market efficiency discussed in Chapter 6, we
would conclude that investment managers are not likely to pick stocks any better
than could a dart thrown at the stock pages of the Wall Street Journal. If investment
managers are not superior stock pickers, then we might ask why one should pay them
a fee to provide a service that may not have any marginal benefit.
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1,000
1,100
1,200
1,300
1,400
1,500
1,600
1,700
1,800
1,900
2,100
2,300
1995 1996 1997
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
1985
1980
1975
Net Assets
($ billions)
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
2,700
3,100
3,300
2,000
2,200
2,500
2,900
2,600
3,000
3,200
2,400
2,800
F I G U R E 2 0 . 6
Net Assets of Money Market Mutual Funds
Data Source: Investment Company Institute, 2010 Investment Company Fact Book, 50th ed. (Washington, DC: ICI), p. 160.
www.icifactbook.org/index.html
.
Chapter 20 The Mutual Fund Industry
501
Repurchase
Agreements
8.6%
T Bills 2.7%
Corp Notes
6.2%
Commercial Paper
27.6%
Other U.S.
Securities
11.2%
Other
securities
12.8%
Certificates of Deposit
30.9%
F I G U R E 2 0 . 7
Average Distribution of Money Market Fund Assets, 2010
Data Source: Investment Company Institute, 2010 Investment Company Fact Book, 50th ed. (Washington,
DC: ICI), p. 166.
www.icifactbook.org/index.html
.
Many investors want the benefits of mutual fund investing without the cost of pay-
ing for investment manager services. The answer is the index fund. An index fund con-
tains the stocks in an index. For example, the mammoth Vanguard S&P 500 index fund
contains the 500 stocks in that index. The stocks are held in a proportion such that
changes to the fund value closely match changes to the index level. There are many
other index funds available that mimic the behavior of various stock and bond indexes.
Index funds do not require managers to choose securities. As a result, these funds
tend to have far lower fees than other actively managed funds. Some financial experts
even argue that these funds will outperform most fund managers because they will
ignore the fads, trends, emotions, and hysteria that often cloud investment adviser
and individual investor judgment. In an interesting admission, the recently retired
founder and former CEO of the Vanguard Group of mutual funds, John Bogle, stated
he was an “index investor.”
1
Fee Structure of Investment Funds
Originally, most shares of mutual funds were sold by brokers who received a commis-
sion for their efforts. Because this commission was paid at the time of the purchase
and immediately subtracted from the redemption value of the shares, these funds
were called load funds. If the fee is charged when the funds are deposited, it is a
front-end load. Most front-end loads are between 1% to 2%, but some exceed 6%.
If a fee is charged when funds are taken out (usually a declining fee over five years),
it is a deferred load. The primary purpose of loads is to provide compensation for
sales brokers. An alternative motivation, especially for deferred-load funds, is to
discourage early withdrawal of deposits.
1
Keynote speech by John Bogle, founder and former CEO of the Vanguard Group, before the American
Business Editors and Writers Personal Finance Workshop, Denver, Colorado, October 27, 2003.
502
Part 6 The Financial Institutions Industry
Beginning in the 1980s, funds that did not charge a direct load (or fee) appeared.
These are called no-load funds. Most no-load funds can be purchased directly by
individual investors, and no middleman is required. Currently about 55% of equity
funds and 65% of bond funds are no load. Many investors have realized that when the
initial deposit is immediately reduced, it can take a long time to catch up to the
returns offered by no-load funds. The shares of front-end loaded funds are termed
Class A shares. Shares in deferred-load funds are termed Class B shares. Class C
shares are issued for no-load funds.
Regardless of whether a load is charged, all mutual fund accounts are subject
to a variety of fees. One of the primary factors that an investor should consider before
choosing a mutual fund is the level of fees the fund charges. The fees are taken out
of portfolio income before it is passed on to the investor. Since the investor is not
directly charged the fees, many will not realize that they have even been subtracted.
The usual fees charged by mutual funds are the following:
• A contingent deferred sales charge imposed at the time of redemption is an
alternative way to compensate financial professionals for their services. This
fee typically applies for the first few years of ownership and then disappears.
• A redemption fee is a back-end charge for redeeming shares. It is
expressed as a dollar amount or a percentage of the redemption price.
• An exchange fee may be charged when transferring money from one fund
to another within the same fund family.
• An account maintenance fee is charged by some funds to maintain low bal-
ance accounts.
• 12b-1 fees, if any, are deducted from the fund’s assets to pay marketing and
advertising expenses or, more commonly, to compensate sales professionals.
By law, 12b-1 fees cannot exceed 1% of the fund’s average net assets per year.
Clearly, there are many opportunities for mutual fund managers to charge
investors for the right to invest. Investors should very carefully evaluate a mutual
fund’s fee structure before investing, since these fees can range from 0.25% to as
much as 8% per year. No research supports the argument that investors get better
returns by investing in funds that charge higher fees. On the contrary, most high-
fee mutual funds fail to do as well, after expenses, as low-fee funds.
Over the last 20 years, competition within the mutual fund industry has produced
substantially lower costs. Between 1980 and 2008, the average total shareholder cost
of equity mutual funds decreased by more than 57%. The cost of bond funds dropped
by 63%. One factor undoubtedly contributing to this reduction is the requirement
by the SEC that mutual funds clearly disclose all fees and costs that investors will
incur. The SEC further requires mutual funds to include in their prospectus a stan-
dardized sample account where $10,000 is invested for one, three, five, and ten years.
The analysis shows investors exactly what fees they will be subject to if they choose
the fund. The fee disclosure requirement makes it very easy for investors to compare
funds, and therefore increases competition among them.
Regulation of Mutual Funds
Mutual funds are regulated under four federal laws designed to protect investors. The
Securities Act of 1933 mandates that funds make certain disclosures. The Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 set out antifraud rules covering the purchase and sale of fund
Chapter 20 The Mutual Fund Industry
503
shares. The Investment Company Act of 1940 requires all funds to register with the
SEC and to meet certain operating standards. Finally, the Investment Advisers Act
of 1940 regulates fund advisers.
As part of this government regulation, all funds must provide two types of doc-
uments free of charge: a prospectus and a shareholder report. A mutual fund’s
prospectus describes the fund’s goals, fees and expenses, and investment strate-
gies and risks; it also gives information on how to buy and sell shares. The SEC
requires a fund to provide a full prospectus either before an investment or together
with the confirmation statement of an initial investment.
Annual and semiannual shareholder reports discuss the fund’s recent perfor-
mance and include other important information, such as the fund’s financial state-
ments. By examining these reports, an investor can learn if a fund has been effective
in meeting the goals and investment strategies described in the fund’s prospectus.
In addition, investors are sent a yearly statement detailing the federal tax sta-
tus of distributions received from the fund. Mutual fund shareholders are taxed on
the fund’s income directly, as if the shareholders held the underlying securities them-
selves. Similarly, any tax-exempt income received by a fund is generally passed on
to the shareholders as tax exempt.
Investment funds are run by brokerage houses and by institutional investors, who
now control over 50% of the outstanding stock in the United States. Over 70% of
the total daily volume in stocks is due to institutions initiating trades. Many of the
mutual funds are run by brokerage houses; others are run by independent investment
advisers. Because of the volume of stock controlled by these investors, there is
tremendous competition for their business. This has led to significant cost cutting
and to the proliferation of alternative methods of trading. For example, computer-
ized trading that eliminates the broker from the transaction accounts for a growing
percentage of the activity in stocks.
Mutual funds are the only companies in America that are required by law to have
independent directors. The SEC believes that independent directors play a critical
role in the governance of mutual funds. In January 2001, the SEC adopted substan-
tive rule amendments designed to enhance the independence of investment company
directors and provide investors with more information to assess directors’ indepen-
dence. These rules require that:
• Independent directors constitute at least a majority of the fund’s board of
directors.
• Independent directors select and nominate other independent directors.
• Any legal counsel for the fund’s independent directors be an independent
legal counsel.
In addition, SEC rules require that mutual funds publish extensive information
about directors, including their business experience and fund shares held. This system
of overseeing the interests of mutual fund shareholders has helped the industry avoid
systemic problems and contributed significantly to public confidence in mutual funds.
Hedge Funds
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |