particularly given its horrific features, we might note that Guiller-
mo del Toro has since sought to capitalise on the film’s surprise com-
mercial and critical success by producing a string of films with similarly
dark fairy tale elements, such as
The Orphanage
and
Mama
(discussed
in the previous chapter), which similarly critique authoritarian corrup-
tion while providing fantastic compensation in the afterlife: a canny
narrative strategy that offsets social critique with sentiment. Alongside
fellow auteur Tim Burton, del Toro has helped nurture popular interest
in darker fairy tale motifs, proving that ‘anti-tales’ are not inimical to
144
Fairy Tale and Film
commercial interests, but may even have become a new niche.
7
Market
forces are a necessary consideration. Films are an expensive business,
generally motivated by a need to recoup investment and turn a profit,
and while some retellings may aim to achieve more, perhaps prompt-
ing viewers to reformulate their understanding of fairy tales and the
ideological work they perform, the results are often constrained by a
desire to entertain and amuse. Ultimately, reboots and ‘reimaginings’
are a means of exploiting a known story, as much as questioning it, and
even as they promise to give us something new this may not necessar-
ily be novel.
Ever After
(1998), a revamped ‘Cinderella’ (briefly mentioned in
Chapter 1), illustrates the pitfalls of mistaking revisionism for radicalism.
Cathy Lynn Preston’s favourable analysis of the film (2004) rests a great
deal on its postmodern features, including a framing device that posi-
tions a female descendant as narrator, yet this does not give her version
greater authority than the Grimm brothers (who visit to hear it), and
what is purported to be the ‘real’ story is scarcely any more feminist.
8
The heroine may be intelligent, assertive, compassionate and socially
aware – further defying the usual princess demeanour with her strength
and impressive swordplay – yet Danielle (Drew Barrymore) puts such
individuality aside when she falls for a feckless prince, and while the
film plays with some conventions – casting Leonardo da Vinci as the
heroine’s ‘godmother’ – other tropes remain untouched, including a
wicked stepmother whose villainy is simply intensified. (Not only does
Rodmilla (Anjelica Huston) kill Danielle’s father for his money, she sells
her stepdaughter off to make more!) Evidently, while any number of
twists may occur in such postmodern retellings, the demonisation of
the older ambitious anti-mother is a given, against whom life with a
vapid young man seems positively idyllic.
The two versions of ‘Snow White’ released in 2012 may also give their
heroines a greater part to play, yet while Tatar has sought to claim these
figures as progressive, describing
Snow White and the
Huntsman
’s heroine
as a ‘warrior princess’ – far removed from her ‘insipid’ folkloric forebear
(Tatar, 2012) – an intrinsic female rivalry undermines such innovation.
Budgeted at $200 million, its script fought over by nine studios, and
featuring
Twilight
star Kristen Stewart, the film clearly aimed to become
a blockbuster, yet for all its expense and fanfare the Manichean set-up
reveals nothing new. In an interview given during its release, director
Rupert Sanders stated that the queen was symbolically intended to rep-
resent death and her stepdaughter life, reiterating an age-old dichotomy
that uncritically aligns ‘evil’ and death with the older woman who must
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |