Insomnia
(Christopher
Nolan, 2002), who helps catch a killer when a higher ranking officer
proves to be corrupt, as well as the female detective Marge Gunderson
(Francis Mcdermott), leading the murder investigation in
Fargo
( Joel
and Ethan Coen, 1996). These scenarios abound with neo-noir ambigu-
ity, cops aren’t as good as they seem, husbands betray their wives for
money, and female figures are notably charged with upholding law and
order. Continuing the legacy set by the likes of ‘Bluebeard’, ‘The Robber
Bridegroom’ and ‘Fitcher’s Bird’, these heroines observe and unearth the
truth about monstrous males and use their capacity as officers of the law
to wield violence in order to despatch them.
In other cases, where women operate outside the law, the use of vio-
lence often poses problems, although some examples present an inter-
esting case of vigilante justice.
Jagged Edge
(Richard Marquand, 1985)
shows how easily a woman can be deceived when lawyer Teddy Barnes
(Glenn Close) becomes overly intimate with her defendant, Jack
Forrester ( Jeff Bridges): a seemingly charming figure on trial for killing
his wife. His innocence, she realises, is a sham, having witnessed his
murderous side after securing his acquittal, yet the wife-killer is shot
dead as he attacks her, dispensing summary justice, outside the court
system, with a gun.
16
Like the denouement of
In the Cut
, imperilled
females are thus allowed to kill men who endanger them, although this
is clearly presented as self-defence (and the narrative doesn’t trouble
itself with questions about what happens when the bodies are found).
The Gift
and
What Lies Beneath
evade the issue of culpability altogether
by making a supernatural entity responsible for despatching male killers,
and again we are invited to think that justice has been served, with
former victims avenging themselves, and protecting other women.
More troubling territory is explored in examples where females aim to
confront male violence, with evident difficulties avoiding charges of
monstrosity.
Dirty Weekend
(Michael Winner, 1993), adapted from the
novel by Helen Zahavi, transforms a feminist revenge fantasy about
a victim-turned-crusader into a vigilante movie where our heroine
seemingly takes things too far.
Butterfl y Kiss
(Michael Winterbottom,
1995) presents a distasteful black comedy in which a female serial killer
108
Fairy Tale and Film
attacks men whilst travelling around the north of England. Claiming
provocation, she is quickly revealed as a psychotic who welcomes her
eventual death. By contrast, the biopic of real-life serial killer Aileen
Wournos,
Monster
(Patty Jenkins, 2003), situates a woman’s killing spree
against a horrendous life of abuse, inviting us to question the accuracy
of the film’s title.
Stieg Larsson’s heroine, Lisbeth Salander, the star of his three
Millennium novels –
The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo
,
The Girl Who Played
with Fire
and
The Girl Who Kicked a Hornet’s Nest
– and their cinematic
adaptations, is an interesting fantasy counterpart to Wournos. A woman
with a troubled past, who investigates and explicitly targets male abusers
and killers of women, Salander is a fascinating figure, a waiflike female
avenger who is both intriguing and intimidating. Larsson was par-
tially inspired by Swedish children’s character the nine-year-old Pippi
Longstocking, created by Astrid Lindgren (who was herself influenced
by Hans Christian Andersen and Elsa Beskow), and Salander is presented
as similarly ‘wayward’, yet attains heroic standing through her defiant
attitude. Having witnessed her mother’s continued abuse at the hands
of her vile misogynistic father, Salander torches him and is subsequently
institutionalised, yet despite being labelled a retarded psychotic by the
authorities she earns a formidable reputation for investigative skills that
enable her to not only eliminate her father, but trace (and kill) various
other male abusers. Larsson has thus created a complex modern heroine
who confronts male violence (often with equal violence), representing
a formidable variant of Bluebeard’s wife in not only refusing to be a vic-
tim but in taking a stand against men who hate women.
17
Tatar deems
Salander among an emerging group of female ‘tricksters’, a group distin-
guished by the fact that ‘they are not just cleverly resourceful and deter-
mined to survive. They’re also committed to social causes and political
change’ (Tatar, 2012). Interestingly, although she links such characters
to Scheherazade, Tatar fails to make the connection with her kindred
figure, Bluebeard’s wife, despite their overt kinship as women who
thwart murderous men. In fact, Bluebeard’s wife may be the ultimate
trickster in not only failing to conform to expectations, by not perish-
ing at her husband’s hands, but escaping her perilous marriage with his
wealth intact (money used to improve her family’s prospects). Salander
may partly be driven by ‘social causes’ in her feminist sympathies, but
we might note that she also uses her wits to make a good deal of money
for herself, all too aware that survival entails self-reliance.
While we might be tempted to think that such figures as Clarice Starling
and Lisbeth Salander challenge the contention that it is Bluebeard,
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |