A Simple Plan
, listens too much to his wife,
Llewellyn doesn’t pay his enough heed, and his greed condemns them
both. In both cases tainted money is shown to be traceable, and its
unwitting finders are assured only of trouble.
12
Although many contemporary crime dramas leave a bitter taste in
the mouth, refuting the idea that there is any such thing as easy money, we
might conclude this chapter with a reminder of tales that seek to provide
audiences with the vicarious pleasure of seeing unlikely heroes take risks,
and profit accordingly, while also providing an ideological feel-good fac-
tor. The triumph of the underdog has been given more explicitly political
Wealth through Stealth
89
affiliations in US thrillers based abroad, set in starkly divided societies
where money offers a means to escape dire circumstances. Interestingly,
those initially seeking wealth ultimately forfeit it to those more in need.
Blood Diamond
(Edward Zwick, 2006) is an ‘Ali Baba’ rewrite in some
ways, rewarding the man who happens to come across an incredible
treasure, rather than the one actively searching for it. Set during the civil
war in Sierra Leone, we are shown how diamonds are used to fund mur-
derous conflict, yet far from admonishing the quest for wealth, the film
affirms its life-changing potential. The narrative follows a rags-to-riches
premise, charting the extraordinary good fortune of its hero, Solomon
Vandy (Djimon Hounsou), who finds a rare diamond when forced to
mine by rebels, successfully hides it before his imprisonment, and sub-
sequently manages to relocate it with the help of white diamond smug-
gler, Danny Archer (Leonardo DiCaprio). Although Archer’s motives are
self-serving until he is fatally shot, he atones for his involvement in the
diamond trade by providing information aiming to expose international
complicity in the war and helps Vandy’s desperate family get out of the
country (relinquishing the dream he had for himself).
A similar sense of conscience mitigates the treasure hunt in
Three
Kings
(David O. Russell, 1999). The story is set in Iraq, 1991, at the end
of the first Gulf War. Three American soldiers discover a map detail-
ing the location of ‘Saddam’s Gold’ – bullion he originally stole from
Kuwait – and set about finding it. Although they plan to keep this loot
for themselves, the Iraqis they encounter during this heist elicit an
important degree of sympathy, and they decide to forfeit the treasure.
Realising they have no legitimate claim on it, they pay off fellow sol-
diers to allow Shi’ite rebels to flee across the Iranian border, and return
the remainder of the haul to Kuwait. It is interesting to note that the
original script by John Ridley did not have these altruistic intentions
in mind. James Mottram reveals that its main theme was greed and
betrayal, based on John Huston’s
The Treasure of the Sierre Madre
(1948),
in which the lust for money ends in murder (Mottram, 2006: 268).
As Marina Warner affirms, Huston’s film was itself inspired by an
Arabian Nights
tale in which three men have their deaths prophesied
under a tree and end up killing each other at this spot seeking to gain
sole custody to the treasure beneath (2012: 11): a plot encapsulated by
the tale type ‘Treasure Finders Murder One Another’ (ATU 763). A film
originally intended to be a warning tale, following a similar narrative
message to
Shallow Grave
and
A Simple Plan
, thus became neatly inverted
by David O. Russell’s script, giving the soldiers of fortune a redemp-
tive about-turn that not only saves them, but potentially redeems our
90
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |