P. Singh, “Problems of the Muslim Minority in India.”
Social Scientist 4 (June 1976): 67–72; Paul Lund, “Ara-
446
AF
J:
madhhab
See
sharia
.
Madina
See m
edina
.
madrasa
A place of
edUcation
for Muslim religious lead-
ers and scholars. Islamic education began in the
prophet m
Uhammad
’s time, but centers of learn-
ing did not begin until after the first and second
centuries of i
slam
. The most prominent of the
earliest madrasas is e
gypt
’s al-a
zhar
, which was
opened under the Fatimids in 970
c
.
e
. The open-
ing in b
aghdad
of the Nizamiyya College in 1066
marked the beginning of the madrasa system.
Many Nizamiyyas were opened afterward; the
point of these madrasas and systems of madrasas
in other regions was to create uniform opinion
regarding Islamic law and
theology
.
Compared to Jewish Yeshiva schools and Chris-
tian scriptural schools, madrasas concentrated on
rote memorization of the q
Uran
, knowledge of
correct ritual practice, and the deduction of legal
points from the scriptures (fiqh), and, in fact, they
eventually produced bodies of law. p
hilosophy
,
astronomy, and
mathematics
were also taught
in medieval Iranian madrasas, but opposition
grew in a
rab
lands during this time against the
study
of philosophy, and, after the 14th century,
Arab madrasas instead emphasized grammar and
rhetoric as well as religious law. Fischer argues
that after the 11th century, madrasas in the Arab
world displayed little innovation, and intellectual
freedom, instead focusing on repetition and com-
mentary. Typically, a lecturer would dictate long
quotations to his students, and then he would
comment on meaning, content, and style.
At times friction between religion and govern-
ment arose as scholarly opinions emanating from
madrasas began to bear legal weight, because this
legal aspect competed with other forms of
aUthor
-
ity
such as the court or the state. In 16th-century
i
ran
, the madrasa system maintained a much
greater degree of independence from the state
than in the Ottoman Empire, although Iranian
rulers built madrasas and granted them endow-
ments. Yet they were also privately supported, and
were not absorbed into the state. The o
ttoman
dynasty
, on the other hand,
found it beneficial to
control the madrasa system.
Modernizing forces in Europe in the 18th and
19th centuries brought about a new struggle, in
which Europeans tried to free education from
M
the church, and to reform education to be more
relevant in the Industrial Age. A similar debate
arose in the Middle East. In Iran during the 19th
century, this resulted in the opening of secular
profession schools, and, by the 20th century, Ira-
nian madrasa students became an isolated yet still
influential minority. The Ottomans reformed their
institutions of higher learning before reforming
the madrasa system for elementary students. In
1924 Ataturk’s government in t
Urkey
eliminated
the madrasa system in favor of secular education;
however, Islamic education was reinstated in the
late 1940s. In the second half of the 19th century
in Egypt, Muslim Egyptians began to attend secu-
lar schools, and a movement arose in the late 19th
to the early 20th century to modernize al-Azhar.
Madrasa education, although replaced to a
great degree by the rise of systems of modern
education, still exists all over the Muslim world.
Fazlur Rahman notes that in contemporary Paki-
stan, madrasas teaching traditional interpretations
of Islam flourish mainly in the countryside. He also
argues that the more any given region in the Mus-
lim world was affected by Western colonialism, the
stronger the hold is in that region of traditional
madrasa-style learning by the religious elite.
See also a
ligarh
; d
eoband
;
kuttab
;
Ulama
;
z
aytUna
m
osqUe
.
Sophia Pandya
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: