Education of the republic of uzbekistan

Conculation
This paper has elucidated different aspects concerning ELF/ESL Syllabi: definitions, types, advantages and shortcomings of each type, stages of syllabus design, an exploration of the relationship between syllabus design and methodology, the various approaches in syllabus design. The writer of the current article believes that no syllabus is better than the other if it serves the purpose it is designed for. The integrated-syllabus, namely using chunks of all syllabi types in our teaching will help students to learn better structures, notions, and functions more communicatively. The writer of the current article also believes that students’ needs-analysis should be conductedbefore applying any syllabus. It would be essential that no syllabus should be imposed on individual teachers as the teacher himself can design his syllabus based on the students’ needs and the course requirements.
Curriculum and Syllabus are the terms of education, imparted to the students by teachers. It means the knowledge, skills or qualifications that are passed on from one generation to another. A subject syllabus is a unit of the curriculum. The two terms differ in a sense that curriculum is a combination of some factors which helps in the planning of an educational program, whereas a syllabus covers the portion of what topics should be taught in a particular subject.
REFERENCES
Clegg, V.L. (2000). Principles of college teaching: Lecturing. [Class handouts]. Manhattan, KS: Author. Davidson, C.I., & Ambrose, S.A. (1994). The new professor’s handbook: A guide to teaching and research in engineering and science. Boston: Anker Publishing Company, Inc. Davis, M. (2002). Designing a course syllabus [On-line]. Retrieved August 4, 2003 from http://www.ksu.edu/catl/edcip943/designsyllab.htm. Gross Davis, B. (1993). Tools for Teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers. McKeachie, W.J. (2002). McKeachie’s teaching tips. (11th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. University of Minnesota Center for Teaching and Learning Services. (n.d.) Syllabus tutorial: What is an effective syllabus? [On-line] Retrieved October 23, 2003 from http://www1.umn.edu/ohr/teachlearn/syllabus/index.html. Wright, D.L. (1987). Getting the most out of your textbook. From newsletter for the University of Nebraska-Lincoln Teaching and Learning Center. Teaching at UNL, 8(3), 1-3
Allwright, R.L. (1997). Seminar notes from “Contributions to Language Learning I”, M.A.
E.L.T. Unit, Department of Applied Linguistics, and Lancaster University. October-
December 1997
Baleghizadeh, S. (2012). Grammatical syllabus and EFL textbooks: the need for consciousness-
raisingactivities. Per-Linguam28(1):111-116 http://dx.doi.org/10.5785/28-1-123.
Barnett, J. (1980). “Notional/Functional Approaches.” In Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.
Ed. Robert Kaplan, Randall L. Jones, and G. Richard Tucker. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury
House. 43–57.
Bourke, J. (2006). Designing a topic-based syllabus for young learners. ELT Journal 60 (3) July
2006 doi:10.1093/elt/ccl008. Available at
https://www.scribd.com/document/189983618/topic-based-syllabus.
Breen, M. (1984) “Process Syllabuses for the Language Classroom.” in Brumfit, C.J. (ed) General