%
ΔP
%
ΔQ
Substituting our known values
into the formula we get:
1
0.8
=
%
ΔP
10
1.25
=
Δ%P
10
%
ΔP = 12.5
To bring about a reduction in
demand of 10 per cent, the price of
motor vehicles would have to rise by
12.5 per cent.
Other Elasticities
Income and cross elasticity of demand
are all treated in exactly the same way
as the analysis of price elasticity of
demand above.
Point income elasticity would be:
Income
elasticity
of
demand
=
ΔQ
ΔY
·
Y
Q
Using calculus:
Income
elasticity
of
demand
=
dQ
dY
·
Y
Q
For cross elasticity the formulas
would be:
Cross
elasticity
of
demand
=
ΔQa
ΔPb
·
Pb
Qa
Where Qa is the quantity demanded
of one good, a, and Pb is the price of
a related good, b (either a substitute
or a complement). For a substitute
dQa
dPb
> 0 and for a complement,
dQa
dPb
< 0.
Cross
elasticity
of
demand
=
dQa
dPb
·
Pb
Qa
In Chapter 3 we saw that demand
can be expressed as a multivariate
function where demand is dependent
on a range of variables which include
price, incomes, tastes and so on. It is
possible to calculate the elasticities
of all these other factors using the
same principles as those outlined
above. In each case it is usual to cal-
culate the elasticity with respect to a
change in one of the variables whilst
holding the others constant.
For example, take the demand
equation
Q
= 1,400 − 4P + 0.04Y.
This equation tells us that demand is
dependent on the price and also the
level of income.
From this equation we can calcu-
late the price elasticity of demand and
the income elasticity of demand. In
this example we will use calculus to
find both elasticities assuming P
= 50
and Y
= 8,000.
Given these values:
Q
= 1,400 − 4(50) + 0.04(8,000)
Q
= 1,400 − 200 + 320
Q
= 1,520
With:
dQ
dP
= −4
ped
= –
4a
50
1,520
b
ped
= –
0.132
Given:
dQ
dY
= 0.04
Income elasticity of demand
(yed)
dQ
dY
·
Y
Q
= 0.04a
8,000
1,520
b
yed
= 0.21
Now look at this demand equation:
Qa
=
100
−
8Pa
−
6Pb
+
4Pc
+
0.015Y
This equation gives the relation-
ship between demand and the prices
of other goods labelled a, b and c
respectively. We can use this to find
the respective cross elasticities.
Assume that the price of good a is
20, the price of good b, 40, the price
of good c, 80 and Y
= 20,000.
Substituting these into our func-
tion gives:
Qa
= 100 − 8Pa − 6Pb + 4Pc
+ 0.015Y
Qa
= 100 − 8(20) − 6(40) + 4(80)
+ 0.015(20,000)
Qa
= 100 − 160 − 240 + 320 + 300
Qa
= 320
The change in demand of good a
with respect to changes in the price
of good b is given by:
dQa
dPb
= −6
The
cross
elasticity
of
demand
= −6a
40
320
b
= −6(0.125)
= –0.75
CHAPTER 4 ELASTICITY AND ITS APPLICATIONS 93
The relationship between goods
a and b is that they are complements –
a rise in the price of good b will lead
to a fall in the quantity demanded of
good a.
The change in demand of good a
with respect to changes in the price
of good c is given by:
dQa
dPc
= 4
Cross elasticity of demand
= 4a
80
320
b
= 4(0.25)
= 1
In this case the relationship
between the two goods is that they
are substitutes – a rise in the price
of good c would lead to a rise in the
quantity demanded of good a.
Price Elasticity of Supply
Many of the principles outlined
above apply also to the price elasti-
city of supply. The formula for the
price elasticity of supply using the
point method is:
Price elasticity of supply
=
ΔQs
Δ P
·
P
Qs
Using calculus:
Price elasticity of supply
=
dQs
dP
·
P
Qs
However, we need to note a
particular issue with price elasti-
city of supply which relates to the
graphical representation of supply
curves.
This is summarized in the following:
t A straight line supply curve inter-
secting the
y-axis at a positive
value has a price elasticity of
supply
> 1
t A straight line supply curve
passing through the origin has a
price elasticity of supply
= 1
t A straight line supply curve
Intersecting the
x-axis at a posit-
ive value has a price elasticity of
supply
< 1
To see why any straight line
supply curve passing through the
origin has a price elasticity of sup-
ply of 1 we can use some basic
knowledge of geometry and similar
triangles.
Figure 4.13 shows a straight line
supply curve S
1
passing through the
origin. The slope of the supply curve
is given by
ΔP
ΔQ
s
. We have high-
lighted a triangle, shaded green, with
the ratio
ΔP
ΔQ
s
relating to a change in
price of 7.5 and a change in quantity
of 1. The larger triangle formed by
taking a price of 22.5 and a quantity
of 3 shows the ratio of the price and
quantity at this point (P/Q). The two
triangles formed by these are both
classed as similar triangles – they
have different lengths to their three
sides but the internal angles are
all the same. The ratio of the sides
must therefore be equal as shown by
equation (1) below:
ΔP
ΔQs
=
P
Qs
(1)
Given our definition of point
elasticity of supply, if we substi-
tute equation 1 into the formula and
rearrange we get:
Price elasticity of supply
=
ΔQs
Δ P
P
Qs
Therefore:
Price elasticity of supply
= 1
Elasticity and Total
Expenditure/Revenue
We have used the term ‘total
expenditure’ in relation to the
demand curve to accurately reflect
the fact that demand is related to
buyers and when buyers pay for
products this represents expendit-
ure. Many books use the term
expenditure and revenue inter-
changeably and in this short section
we are going to refer to revenue.
FIGURE 4.13
Price (
€)
Quantity
1
2
3
4
5
6
5
0
10
25
30
20
15
S
1
Q
P
∆P
∆Q
s
94 PART 2 SUPPLY AND DEMAND: HOW MARKETS WORK
Total revenue is found by mul-
tiplying the quantity purchased
by the average price paid. This is
shown by the formula:
TR
= P × Q
Total revenue can change if either
price or quantity, or both, change.
This can be seen in Figure 4.14
where a rise in the price of a good
from P
o
to P
1
has resulted in a fall in
quantity demanded from Q
o
to Q
1
.
We can represent the change in
price as
ΔP so that the new price is
(P
+ ΔP) and the change in quant-
ity as
ΔQ so that the new quantity is
(Q
+ ΔQ) so TR can be represented
thus:
TR
= (P + ΔP)(Q + ΔQ)
If we multiply out this expression
as shown then we get:
TR
= (P + ΔP)(Q + ΔQ)
TR
= PQ + PΔQ + ΔPQ + ΔPΔQ
In Figure 4.14, this can be seen
graphically.
As a result of the change in price
there is an additional amount of
revenue shown by the blue rectangle
(Q
ΔP). However, this is offset by the
reduction in revenue caused by the fall
in quantity demanded as a result of the
change in price shown by the green
rectangle (P
ΔQ). There is also an
area indicated by the yellow rectangle
which is equal to
ΔPΔQ. This leaves us
with a formula for the change in TR as:
ΔTR = QΔP + PΔQ + ΔPΔQ
Let us substitute some figures into
our formula to see how this works in
practice. Assume the original price
of a product is 15 and the quantity
demanded at this price is 750. When
the price rises to 20 the quantity
demanded falls to 500.
Using the equation:
TR
= PQ + PΔQ + ΔPQ + ΔPΔQ
TR is now:
TR
= 15(750) + 15(–250)
+ 5(750) + 5(–250)
TR
= 10,000
The change in TR is:
ΔTR = QΔP + PΔQ + ΔPΔQ
ΔTR = 750(5) + 15(–250) + 5(–250)
ΔTR = 3,750 − 3,750 − 1,250
ΔTR = –1,250
In this example the effect of the
change in price has been negative
on TR. We know from our analysis
of price elasticity of demand that
this means the percentage change
in quantity demand was greater than
the percentage change in price –
in other words, price elasticity of
demand must be elastic at this point
(
>1). For the change in TR to be pos-
itive, therefore, the price elasticity of
demand must be
<1.
We can express the relationship
between the change in TR and price
elasticity of demand as an inequality
as follows:
Price elasticity of demand
=
ΔQ
Δ P
·
P
Q
> 1
The original TR is found by multiplying the original price ( P
o
) by the original quantity ( Q
o
) and is shown by the red
+ green
rectangles.
Price
Quantity
Q
1
Q
0
P
1
P
0
D
1
∆ PQ
∆ P∆ Q
Q∆ P
P∆ Q
Th
i i l TR i f
d
FIGURE 4.14
CHAPTER 4 ELASTICITY AND ITS APPLICATIONS 95
When price increases, revenue
decreases if price elasticity of
demand meets this inequality.
Equally, for a price increase to result
in a rise in revenue ped must meet
the inequality below:
Price elasticity of demand
=
ΔQ
Δ P
·
P
Q
< 1
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |