Course paper theme: george byron-his life and work. Scientific advisor

Conclusion
In short, I think I was able to complete this course work according to the plan. All the information was given about the work and life of the poet, satirist Byron, who made a significant contribution to the romantic era.
The analysis in this paper reveals the innovative nature of Byron's life and work. The combination of revolutionary pathos, lyrical sincerity and caustic Byron's sarcasm determines the unique originality of his poems. Byron casts his anger not only at the hideous moral traits of the ruling classes, but also at religious, poetic, ethical, aesthetic and political norms.
Byron’s cultural ecology characterizes the dynamic interdependencies between nature and culture as operating on a global scale, in contrast to most other Romantics, who work to preserve local, natural areas apart from modernity’s techno-domination. As many have remarked, eco-localism, the primary environmental strategy coming out of a Wordsworthian nature aesthetic, fails to address the global threat to ecosystem flourishing. In contrast, Byron’s eco-cosmopolitanism considers that a threat to any place is a threat to all places, pointing toward a contrasting environmental strategy of global collaboration for climate justice. Wordsworth’s nature and Byron’s nature form complementary poles of in the highly contested, broad environmental discourse of the Romantic period.
Though during his lifetime Byron consciously attempted to fashion a public identity for himself through his poetry and letters, after his death artists, historians, philosophers, and politicians of every ideological stripe adopted him for their purposes. The polemical uses that Italians made of Byron’s life and poetry varied from decade to decade, depending on what agendas these authors hoped his symbolism would serve. Byron influenced a wide range of nineteenth-century poets and novelists, including Garibaldi, Guerrazzi, Leopardi, Manzoni, Nicolini, and Nievo. Many versions of Byronic mythology exist, from that of Mazzinian nationalism, Garibaldian republicanism, Giobertiani neo-Guelphism, Cavourian Savoy expansionism, Crispian imperialism, and Mussolini’s fascism. All of these offer versions of Byron’s relationship to the complex processes by which, between 1821 and 1866, the Italian state emerged from a collection of disaggregated kingdoms and spheres of influence.
Finally, our scientific work on the poet and satirist Byron has come to an end. I hope that the course work has been able to provide complete information about Byron's entire life and work, as outlined in the plan, and that it will benefit other researchers in the future.