Janina Buetkiene Comparative matrix of grammatical categories of the noun in ME and MU (MR)
№
|
LANGUAGE
|
F E A T U R E S
| | | | | |
Number
|
Case
|
Gender
|
Animate/ inanimate
| |
English
|
+
|
+(2)
|
-
|
-
| |
Uzbek
|
+
|
+(6)
|
-
|
-
| |
Russian
|
+
|
+(6)
|
+
|
+
|
№
|
LANGUAGE
|
GENDER TYPES
| | | | |
masculine
|
Ferminine
|
neutral
| |
English
|
-
|
-
|
-
| |
Uzbek
|
-
|
-
|
-
| |
Russian
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
The category of gender of nouns in ME, MU and MR
There are differences between the languages under discussion:
In English and Uzbek the category of gender is a semantic category and not a grammatical one like that of Russian:
It is important to know that in the languages of the world there are three ways of expressing gender of nouns:
- Morphological
- Lexical
- Syntactical
Out of these three possibilities Russian uses all the three ways, but English and Uzbek use only two, that is lexical and syntactic ways, and never use the morphological way: tiger –tigeress, poet poetess; rais – raisa, olim - olima etc are old English and Uzbek words, at present the “ –ess/-a” have become non productive. - Out of these three possibilities Russian uses all the three ways, but English and Uzbek use only two, that is lexical and syntactic ways, and never use the morphological way: tiger –tigeress, poet poetess; rais – raisa, olim - olima etc are old English and Uzbek words, at present the “ –ess/-a” have become non productive.
- So in comparing the gender systems of the three languages Russian may serve as an etalon language.
Grammatical category of number - What is typologically important is that the compared languages use different means of expressing the category of number. But not a single of them has to resort to the way of forming the plural of nouns by repeating the word twice like the Indonesian language does( like bahasi-bahasi).
№
|
LANGUAGE
|
WAYS OF EXPRESSING NUMBER
| | | | |
Sound alter nation
|
Keeping the root as it is
|
Synthetic (affixal)
| |
English
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
2
|
Uzbek
|
-
|
-
|
+
|
3
|
Russian
|
+
|
+
|
+
| Examples:
Synthetic (affixal)
Boy-boys
Tree -trees
Bola-bolalar
Kitob-kitoblar
Мальчик-мальчики
Sound alternation
Man-men
Mouse-mice
-
Время-времена
Племя-племена
Keeping the root as it is
Fish-fish
Sheep-sheep
-
Метро-метро
Радио-радио
The category of case of nouns in Modern English, Uzbek and Russian
№
|
LANGUAGE
|
CASE TYPES
| | | | | | | | | |
common
|
Possessie/genetive
|
Dative
|
accusative
|
Instrumental
|
Prepositional
|
Locative-temporative
|
Ablative (exit)
| |
English
|
+
|
+
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
| |
Uzbek
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
-
|
-
|
+
|
+
| |
Russian
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
-
|
-
|
English
Common
boy
Genitive
Boy`s
Uzbek
Bosh
(common)
bola
Qaratqich
(possessive)
bolaning
Jo`nalish
(dative)
bolaga
Tushum
(accusative)
bolani
O`rin-payt
(locative)
Bolada
Chiqish
(ablative)
boladan
Russian
Common
(именительный)
мальчик
Possessive
(родительный)
мальчика
Dative
(дательный)
мальчику
Accusative
(винительный)
мальчика
Instrumental
(творительный)
мальчиком
Prepositional
(предложный)
О мальчике
"How can English express case relations other than common and possessive/ genetive"? English has prepositions which compensate the lacking case forms, word order also functioning as such in the needed cases: Men Jimga xat yubordim I sent a letter to Jim -or I sent Jim a letter References: - Comparative typology of English and Mother Tongue, Lecture materials, PhD G’.M.Hoshimov, Andizhan 2017-2018
- Грамматика английского языка, В.Л.Каушанская, Р.Л.Ковнер, 4-е издание, Ленинград 1973
- Comparative typology of The English, Uzbek and Russian languages, M.I.Rasulova, Z.I.Shukurova, Tashkent 2017
- https://ppt-online.org
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |