Coherence and Cohesion in English Discourse

References
Aktas. R. and Cortes, V. (2008) ‘Shell nouns as cohesive devices in published and 
ESL student writing.’ 
Journal of English for Academic Purposes
7/1, 3-14. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.02.002
Beaugrande, R. de and Dressler, W. (1981) 
Introduction to Text Linguistics
. London: 
Longman.
Bennett, K. (2009) ‘English academic style manuals: A Survey.’ 
Jour nal of English for 
Academic Purposes
8, 43-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.12.003
Biber
, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. and Finegan, E. (1999) 
Longman Grammar 
of Spoken and Written English
. Harlow: Pearson.
Brown, G. and Yule, G. (1983) 
Discourse Analysis. 
Cambridge: Cambridge University 
Press.
Bublitz, W. (1999) ‘Introduction: Views on coherence.’ In: Bublitz, W., Lenk, U. and 
Ventola, E. (eds) 
Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse
. Amsterdam, 
Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 1-7.
Cornish, F. (2008) ‘How indexicals function in texts: Discourse, text, and a neo-Gricean 
account of indexical reference.’ 
Journal of Pragmatics 
40,
 
997-1018.
Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (2001) 
Coherence in Political Speeches. 
Brno: Masaryk 
University.
Elrich, K. (1992) ‘Scientific texts and deictic structure.’ In: Stein, D. (1992) 
Cooperating 
with Written Texts. The Pragmatics and Comprehension of Written Texts
. Berlin, 
New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 201-231.
Flowerdew, L. (2004) ‘The argument for using English specia lized corpora to understand 
academic and professional lan guage.’ In: Connor, U. and Upton, T. (eds) 
Discourse in the Professions.
Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 11-33.
Flowerdew, L. (forthcoming). ‘Grammar and the research article.’ In: Chapelle, C. (ed.) 
Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics
. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Fowler, R. (1986) 
Linguistic Criticism.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gray, B. and Cortes, V. (2011) ‘Perception vs. evidence: An analysis of 
this
and 
these
in academic prose.’ 
English for Specific Purposes 
30,
 
31-43. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2010.06.004
Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. (1976) 
Cohesion in English. 
New York: Longman.
Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. (1989) 
Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language 
in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. 
2
nd
ed. Oxford:
 
Oxford University Press.
Harwood, N. (2005) ‘We do not seem to have a theory… The theory I present here 
attempts to fill this gap’: Inclusive and Exclusive Pronouns in Academic Writing. 
Applied Linguistics 
26, 343-375. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami012
Hewings (2006) 
Academic Writing in Context
. London, New York: Continuum.
Hewings, M. and Hewings, A. (2002) ‘It is interesting to note that …’: A comparative 
study of anticipatory ‘it’ in student and published writing.’ 
English for Specific 
Purposes
21, 367-383.
Hoey, M. (1991) 
Patterns of Lexis in Text
. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hoey, M. (1996) ‘A clause-relational analysis of selected dictionary entries.’ In: Caldas-
Coulthard, C. R. and Coulthard, M. (eds) 
Texts and Practices. 
London, New 
York: Routledge. 150-165.

---

27
Hoey, M. (2001) 
Textual Interaction: An Introduction to Written Discourse Analysis
. 
London, New York: Routledge.
Huddleston, R. and Pullum, G. K. (2002) 
The Cambridge Grammar of the English 
Language. 
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hunston, S. (2007) ‘Using corpus to investigate stance quantitavely and qualitatively.’ In: 
Englebretson, T. (ed.)
 Stancetaking in Discourse
, Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John 
Benjamins, 27-48.
Hunston, S. and Francis, G. (1999) 
Pattern Grammar
. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Hunston, S. and Sinclair, J. (2000). ‘A local grammar of evaluation.’ In: Hunston, S. and 
Thompson. G. (eds) 
Evaluation in Text.
Oxford: Oxford University Press. 74–101.
Hyland, K. (1998): 
Hedging in Scientific Research Articles.
Amsterdam, Philadelphia: 
John Benjamins.
Hyland, K. (2001) ‘Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in 
research articles.’ 
English for Specific Purposes
18, 207-226. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00012-0
Hyland, K. (2002) ‘Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing.’ 
Journal 
of Pragmatics 
34, 1091-1112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00035-8
Hyland, K. (2005) ‘Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse.’ 
Discourse Studies
7/2, 173-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365
Hyland, K. (2010) Community and individuality: Performing identity 
in applied linguistics. 
Written Communication
24/2, 159-188. 
https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088309357846
Ivanič, R. (1998) 
Writing and Identity: The Discoursal Construction of Identity in 
Academic Writing.
Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kuo, C.-H. (1999) ‘The use of personal pronouns: role relation ships in scientific journal 
articles.’ 
English for Specific Pur poses
18/2, 121-138.
Kehler, A. (2002) 
Coherence, Reference and the Theory of Grammar. 
Center for the Study 
of Language and Information. Stanford: Stanford University.
Levinson, S. (1983) 
Pragmatics
. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lyons, J. (1977) 
Semantics
, 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Martin, J. R. (1992) 
English Text: System and Structure.
Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John 
Benjamins.
Martin, J. R., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. and Painter, C. (1997). 
Working with Functional 
Grammar.
London:Arnold.
Mey, J. (1993) 
Pragmatics: An Introduction.
Malden, Oxford, Carlton: Blackwell.
Miššíková, G. (2007) 
Analysing Translation as Text and Discourse. 
Praha: Jednota 
tlumočníků a překladatelů.
Piwek, P., Beun, R-J., Cremers, A., 2008. ‘“Proximal” and “distal” in language and 
cognition: evidence from deictic demonstratives in Dutch.’ 
Journal of Pragmatics 
40, 694–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.05.001
Povolná, R. (2012) ‘Enhancing coherent interpretation in academic written discourse.’ 
In: Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. and Povolná, R. (eds) 
Discourse Interpretation: 
Approaches and Applications.
Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars 
Publishing. 179-208.
Ribera, J. (2007) ‘Text deixis in narrative sequences.’ 
IJES
7(1), 149-168.

---

28
Schmid, H. (2000). 
English Abstract Nouns as Conceptual Shells: From Corpus to 
Cognition
. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
Seidlhofer, B. and Widdowson, H. G. (1997) ‘Coherence in
 
summary: The contexts of 
appropriate discourse.’ In: Bublitz, W., Lenk, U. and Ventola, E. (eds) 
Coherence 
in Spoken and Written Discourse
. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
205-219.
Swales, J. (1990) 
Genre Analysis
. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. (2004) 
Research Genres
. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tanskanen, S.-K. (2006) 
Collaborating Towards Coherence Lexical Cohesion in English 
Discourse. 
Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Tárnyiková, J. (2002) 
From Texture to Text
. 3
rd
ed. Olomouc: Univezita Palackého.
Wales, K. (1996) 
Personal Pronouns in Present-Day English. 
Cambridge: Cambridge 
University Press.
Wales, K. (2001) 
A Dictionary of Stylistics.
2
nd
ed. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
Widdowson, H. (1978) 
Teaching Language as Communication.
Oxford: Oxford University 
Press.
Widdowson, H. (2004) 
Text, Context, Pretext: Critical Issues in Discourse Analysis.
Malden, Oxford, Carlton: Blackwell.

---

29