|
T. (1995) ‘Coherence in text vs coherence in mind.’ In: Gernsbacher, M. A. and
Givón, T. (eds)
Coherence in Spontaneous Text.
Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John
Benjamins. 59-116.
Givón,
T. (2001)
Syntax: An Introduction.
Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gough, V. and Talbot, M. (1996) ‘“Guilt over games boys play.” Coherence as a focus for
examining the constitution of heterosexual subjectivity on a problem page.’ In:
152
Caldas-Coulthard, C. and Coulthard, M. (eds)
Texts and Practices
. London, New
York: Routledge. 214-230.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978)
Language as Social Semiotic. The Social Interpretation of
Language and Meaning
. London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1985)
An Introduction to Functional Grammar
. London: Edward
Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. (1989)
Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language
in a Social-Semiotic Perspective.
2
nd
ed. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Halmari, H. (2005) ‘In search of “successful” political persuasion: A comparison of the
styles of Bill Clinton and Ronald Reagan.’ In: Halmari, H. and Virtanen, T. (eds)
Persuasion Across Genres.
Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 105-134.
Hoey, M. (2001)
Textual Interaction: An Introduction to Written Discourse Analysis
.
London, New York: Routledge.
Honohan, I. (2008) ‘Metaphors of solidarity.’ In: Carver, T. and Pikalo, J. (eds)
Political
Language and Metaphor.
London, New York: Routledge. 69-82.
Hunston, S. (1999) ‘Evaluation and the planes of discourse: Status and value in persuasive
texts.’ In: Hunston, S. and Thompson, G. (eds)
Evaluation in Text. Authorial
Stance and the Construction of Discourse.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
176-207.
Kovalyova, N. (2005) ‘Presidential inaugural addresses: A study in a genre development.’
In: Skaffari, J., Peokola, M., Carrol, R., Hiltunen, R. and Wĺrvik, B. (eds)
Opening
Windows on Texts and Discourses of the Past.
Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John
Benjamins. 39-52.
Martin, J. R. and White, P. R. R. (2005)
The Language of Evaluation. Appraisal in English.
London, New York: Palgrave.
Miššíková, G. (2005) ‘Background knowledge in interpretation of discourse.’ In:
Povolná, R. and Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (eds)
Discourse and Interaction
1. Brno Seminar on Linguistic Studies in English: Proceedings 2005.
Brno:
Masaryk University. 85-98.
Povolná, R. (2010) Interactive Discourse Markers in Spoken Discourse. Brno: Masaryk
University.
Sarangi, S. (2004) ‘Mediated interpretation of hybrid textual environments.’
Text
24(3),
297-301. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2004.011
Seidlhofer, B. and Widdowson, H. G. (1997) ‘Coherence in
summary: The contexts of
appropriate discourse.’ In: Bublitz, W., Lenk, U. and Ventola, E. (eds)
Coherence
in Spoken and Written Discourse
.
How to Create it and How to Describe it
.
Selected Papers from the International Workshop on Coherence, Augsburg 1997.
Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 205-219.
Simon-Vandenbergen, A.-M. (1997) ‘Modal (un)certainty in political
discourse: A functional account.’
Language Science
, 19(4), 341-356.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(96)00068-X
Sperber, D., Clément, F., Heintz, H., Mascaro, O., Mercier, H., Origgi, G. and
Wilson, D. (2010) ‘Epistemic vigilance.’
Mind and Language
25, 359-393.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01394.x
Swales, J. M. (1990)
Genre Analysis. English in Academic and Research Settings.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
153
Tanskanen, S.-K. (2006)
Collaborating towards Coherence: Lexical Cohesion in English
Discourse.
Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Tárnyiková, J. (1995)
Chapters from Modern English Syntax II.
(
Text Perspective
).
Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého.
Trosborg, A. (2000) ‘The inaugural address.’ In: Trosborg, A. (ed.)
Analysing Professional
Genres.
Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 112-145.
van Dijk, T. A. (1997) ‘Cognitive context models and discourse.’ In: Stamenov, M. (ed.)
Language Structure, Discourse and the Access to Consciousness.
Amsterdam,
Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 189-226.
van Dijk, T. A. (2002) ‘Political discourse and political cognition.’ In: Chilton, P. A. and
Schaffner C. (eds)
Politics as Text and Talk. Analytical Approaches to Political
Discourse.
Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 204-236.
van Dijk, T. A. (2006) ‘Discourse and manipulation.’
Discourse and Society
17(3),
359-383.
van Dijk, T. A. and Kintsch, W. (1983)
Strategies of Discourse Comprehension.
New
York, London: Academic Press.
van Leeuwen, T. (1996) ‘The representation of social actors.’ In: Caldas-Coulthard, R.
and Coulthard,
M. (eds)
Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse
Analysis
. London: Routledge. 32-70.
van Leeuwen, T. (2007) ‘Legitimation in discourse and communication.’
Discourse and
Communication
1(1), 91-112.
van De Mieroop, D. (2007) ‘The complementarity of two identities and two approaches:
Quantitative and qualitative analysis of institutional and professional identity.’
Journal of Pragmatics
39
,
1120-1142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.01.
009
Wilson, J. (1990)
Politically Speaking
. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wodak, R. (1996)
Disorders of Discourse
. London: Longman.
Wodak, R. (2007a) ‘Discourse in European Union organizations: Aspects of access,
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |
