Coherence and Cohesion in English Discourse

 
T. (1995) ‘Coherence in text vs coherence in mind.’ In: Gernsbacher, M. A. and 
Givón, T. (eds)
 Coherence in Spontaneous Text.
 
Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John 
Benjamins. 59-116.
Givón,
 
T. (2001) 
Syntax: An Introduction. 
Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gough, V. and Talbot, M. (1996) ‘“Guilt over games boys play.” Coherence as a focus for 
examining the constitution of heterosexual subjectivity on a problem page.’ In: 

---

152
Caldas-Coulthard, C. and Coulthard, M. (eds)
 Texts and Practices
. London, New 
York: Routledge. 214-230.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978) 
Language as Social Semiotic. The Social Interpretation of 
Language and Meaning
. London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1985) 
An Introduction to Functional Grammar
. London: Edward 
Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. (1989) 
Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language 
in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. 
2
nd
ed. Oxford:
 
Oxford University Press.
Halmari, H. (2005) ‘In search of “successful” political persuasion: A comparison of the 
styles of Bill Clinton and Ronald Reagan.’ In: Halmari, H. and Virtanen, T. (eds) 
Persuasion Across Genres. 
Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 105-134.
Hoey, M. (2001) 
Textual Interaction: An Introduction to Written Discourse Analysis
. 
London, New York: Routledge.
Honohan, I. (2008) ‘Metaphors of solidarity.’ In: Carver, T. and Pikalo, J. (eds)
 Political 
Language and Metaphor. 
London, New York: Routledge. 69-82.
Hunston, S. (1999) ‘Evaluation and the planes of discourse: Status and value in persuasive 
texts.’ In: Hunston, S. and Thompson, G. (eds) 
Evaluation in Text. Authorial 
Stance and the Construction of Discourse.
Oxford: Oxford University Press. 
176-207.
Kovalyova, N. (2005) ‘Presidential inaugural addresses: A study in a genre development.’ 
In: Skaffari, J., Peokola, M., Carrol, R., Hiltunen, R. and Wĺrvik, B. (eds) 
Opening 
Windows on Texts and Discourses of the Past.
Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John 
Benjamins. 39-52. 
Martin, J. R. and White, P. R. R. (2005) 
The Language of Evaluation. Appraisal in English. 
London, New York: Palgrave.
Miššíková, G. (2005) ‘Background knowledge in interpretation of discourse.’ In: 
Povolná, R. and Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (eds) 
Discourse and Interaction 
1. Brno Seminar on Linguistic Studies in English: Proceedings 2005.
Brno: 
Masaryk University. 85-98.
Povolná, R. (2010) Interactive Discourse Markers in Spoken Discourse. Brno: Masaryk 
University.
Sarangi, S. (2004) ‘Mediated interpretation of hybrid textual environments.’ 
Text
24(3), 
297-301. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2004.011
Seidlhofer, B. and Widdowson, H. G. (1997) ‘Coherence in
 
summary: The contexts of 
appropriate discourse.’ In: Bublitz, W., Lenk, U. and Ventola, E. (eds) 
Coherence 
in Spoken and Written Discourse
. 
How to Create it and How to Describe it
. 
Selected Papers from the International Workshop on Coherence, Augsburg 1997. 
Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 205-219.
Simon-Vandenbergen, A.-M. (1997) ‘Modal (un)certainty in political 
discourse: A functional account.’ 
Language Science
, 19(4), 341-356. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(96)00068-X
Sperber, D., Clément, F., Heintz, H., Mascaro, O., Mercier, H., Origgi, G. and 
Wilson, D. (2010) ‘Epistemic vigilance.’ 
Mind and Language 
25, 359-393. 
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01394.x
Swales, J. M. (1990) 
Genre Analysis. English in Academic and Research Settings.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

---

153
Tanskanen, S.-K. (2006) 
Collaborating towards Coherence: Lexical Cohesion in English 
Discourse. 
Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Tárnyiková, J. (1995) 
Chapters from Modern English Syntax II.
(
Text Perspective
). 
Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého.
Trosborg, A. (2000) ‘The inaugural address.’ In: Trosborg, A. (ed.) 
Analysing Professional 
Genres. 
Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 112-145.
van Dijk, T. A. (1997) ‘Cognitive context models and discourse.’ In: Stamenov, M. (ed.) 
Language Structure, Discourse and the Access to Consciousness. 
Amsterdam, 
Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 189-226.
van Dijk, T. A. (2002) ‘Political discourse and political cognition.’ In: Chilton, P. A. and 
Schaffner C. (eds) 
Politics as Text and Talk. Analytical Approaches to Political 
Discourse.
Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 204-236.
van Dijk, T. A. (2006) ‘Discourse and manipulation.’ 
Discourse and Society
17(3), 
359-383.
van Dijk, T. A. and Kintsch, W. (1983) 
Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. 
New 
York, London: Academic Press.
van Leeuwen, T. (1996) ‘The representation of social actors.’ In: Caldas-Coulthard, R. 
and Coulthard,
 
M. (eds) 
Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse 
Analysis
. London: Routledge. 32-70.
van Leeuwen, T. (2007) ‘Legitimation in discourse and communication.’ 
Discourse and 
Communication
1(1), 91-112.
van De Mieroop, D. (2007) ‘The complementarity of two identities and two approaches: 
Quantitative and qualitative analysis of institutional and professional identity.’ 
Journal of Pragmatics 
39
,
1120-1142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.01. 
009
Wilson, J. (1990) 
Politically Speaking
. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wodak, R. (1996) 
Disorders of Discourse
. London: Longman.
Wodak, R. (2007a) ‘Discourse in European Union organizations: Aspects of access,