SELF-ASSESSMENT TASK 5.6 In 2013 the Mexican government introduced a
number of new taxes. Th
ese included a value-added
tax of 16% on public transport and a tax of 8% on
food containing a high number of calories. It also
imposed a fl at sum tax on soft drinks.
Th
ese taxes pushed up the price of food and
contributed to a rise in Mexico’s infl ation rate at a
time when poverty was increasing in the country.
Th
e top 10% of income earners in Mexico spend less
than a quarter of their disposable income on food.
Th
is contrasts with the 50% spent by the half of the
population with the lowest income.
1 Defi ne a fl at sum tax.
2 Explain why imposing a tax on public transport
may increase a country’s infl ation rate.
3 What
eff ect would a reduction in poverty be likely
to have on food’s weighting in Mexico’s consumer
price index?
4 Discuss whether imposing a tax on food would
increase poverty.
Figure 5.3 Non-inflationary economic growth
Price level
Real GDP
0
P AD AD AD 1
AD 1
AD 2
AD 2
AS 1
AS 2
AS Y 1
Y 2
Y The eff ectiveness of policies to correct demand- pull inflation Raising income tax to reduce demand-pull infl ation may
backfi re. Th
is is because workers may seek higher wages to
maintain their disposable income. If their wage claims are
granted, fi rms’ costs of production may increase. Higher costs
can generate cost-push infl ation. Higher income tax rates may
also, as noted earlier, create disincentive eff ects. Some workers
may respond to a reduction in disposable income by leaving
the labour force. Th
is will reduce the economy’s productive
capacity and so reduce aggregate supply.
Th
ere are a number of reasons why a rise in the rate
of interest may not discourage consumer expenditure.
Commercial banks usually do keep their interest rates in
line with the central bank’s as it is the rate they will have
to pay if they need to borrow from the central bank. Th
ere
is, however, no guarantee that they will always raise their
interest rates when the central bank increases its rate.
Even if consumers are faced with higher interest rates,
they may not reduce their spending if they are optimistic
about the future. (Th
e same applies to a rise in income
tax where households may cut their saving rather than
their spending if they think their incomes will rise in
the future.)