It was a vicious cycle. The first signs of cancer caused pain. The morphine and other painkillers
he took suppressed his appetite. His pancreas had been partly removed and his liver had been
replaced, so his digestive system was faulty and had trouble absorbing protein. Losing weight
made it harder to embark on aggressive drug therapies. His emaciated condition also made him
more susceptible to infections, as did the immunosuppressants he sometimes took to keep his body
from rejecting his liver transplant. The weight loss reduced the lipid layers around his pain
receptors, causing him to suffer more. And he was prone to extreme mood swings, marked by
prolonged
bouts of anger and depression, which further suppressed his appetite.
Jobs’s eating problems were exacerbated over the years by his psychological attitude toward
food. When he was young, he learned that he could induce euphoria and ecstasy by fasting. So
even though he knew that he should eat—his doctors were begging him to consume high-quality
protein—lingering in the back of his subconscious, he admitted, was his instinct for fasting and for
diets like Arnold Ehret’s fruit regimen that he had embraced as a teenager. Powell kept telling him
that it was crazy, even pointing out that Ehret had died at fifty-six when he stumbled and knocked
his head, and she would get angry when he came to the table and just stared silently at his lap. “I
wanted him to force himself to eat,” she said, “and it was incredibly tense at home.” Bryar Brown,
their part-time cook, would still come in the afternoon and make an array of healthy dishes, but
Jobs would touch his tongue to one or two dishes and then dismiss them all as inedible. One
evening he announced, “I could probably
eat a little pumpkin pie,” and the even-tempered Brown
created a beautiful pie from scratch in an hour. Jobs ate only one bite, but Brown was thrilled.
Powell talked to eating disorder specialists and psychiatrists, but her husband tended to shun
them. He refused to take any medications, or be treated in any way, for his depression. “When you
have feelings,” he said, “like sadness or anger about your cancer or your plight, to mask them is to
lead an artificial life.” In fact he swung to the other extreme. He became morose, tearful, and
dramatic as he lamented to all around him that he was about to die. The depression became part of
the vicious cycle by making him even less likely to eat.
Pictures and videos of Jobs looking emaciated began to appear online, and soon rumors were
swirling about how sick he was. The problem, Powell realized,
was that the rumors were true, and
they were not going to go away. Jobs had agreed only reluctantly to go on medical leave two years
earlier, when his liver was failing, and this time he also resisted the idea. It would be like leaving
his homeland, unsure that he would ever return. When he finally bowed to the inevitable, in
January 2011, the board members were expecting it; the telephone meeting in which he told them
that he wanted another leave took only three minutes. He had often discussed with the board, in
executive session, his thoughts about who could take over if anything happened to him, presenting
both short-term and longer-term combinations of options. But there was no doubt that, in this
current situation, Tim Cook would again take charge of day-to-day operations.
The following Saturday afternoon, Jobs allowed his wife to convene a meeting of his doctors.
He realized that he was facing the type of problem that he never permitted at Apple. His treatment
was fragmented rather than integrated. Each of his myriad maladies was being
treated by different
specialists—oncologists, pain specialists, nutritionists, hepatologists, and hematologists—but they
were not being co-ordinated in a cohesive approach, the way James Eason had done in Memphis.
“One of the big issues in the health care industry is the lack of caseworkers or advocates that are
the quarterback of each team,” Powell said. This was particularly true at Stanford, where nobody
seemed in charge of figuring out how nutrition was related to pain care and to oncology. So
Powell asked the various Stanford specialists to come to their house for a meeting that also
included some outside doctors with a more aggressive and integrated approach, such as David
Agus of USC. They agreed on a new regimen for dealing with the pain and for coordinating the
other treatments.
Thanks to some pioneering science, the team of doctors had been able to keep Jobs one step
ahead of the cancer. He had become one of the first twenty people in the world to have all of the
genes of his cancer tumor as well as of his normal DNA sequenced.
It was a process that, at the
time, cost more than $100,000.
The gene sequencing and analysis were done collaboratively by teams at Stanford, Johns
Hopkins, and the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard. By knowing the unique genetic and
molecular signature of Jobs’s tumors, his doctors had been able to pick specific drugs that directly
targeted the defective molecular pathways that caused his cancer cells to grow in an abnormal
manner. This approach, known as molecular targeted therapy, was more effective than traditional
chemotherapy, which attacks the process of division of all the body’s cells, cancerous or not. This
targeted therapy was not a silver bullet, but at times it seemed close to one: It allowed his doctors
to look at a large number of drugs—common and uncommon, already available or only in
development—to see which three or four might work best. Whenever his cancer mutated and
repaved around one of these drugs, the doctors had another drug lined up to go next.
Although Powell was diligent in overseeing her husband’s care,
he was the one who made the
final decision on each new treatment regimen. A typical example occurred in May 2011, when he
held a meeting with George Fisher and other doctors from Stanford, the gene-sequencing analysts
from the Broad Institute, and his outside consultant David Agus. They all gathered around a table
at a suite in the Four Seasons hotel in Palo Alto. Powell did not come, but their son, Reed, did. For
three hours there were presentations from the Stanford and Broad researchers on the new
information they had learned about the genetic signatures of his cancer. Jobs was his usual feisty
self. At one point he stopped a Broad Institute analyst who had made the mistake of using
PowerPoint slides. Jobs chided him and explained why Apple’s Keynote presentation software
was better; he even offered to teach him how to use it. By the end of the meeting, Jobs and his
team had gone through all of the molecular data, assessed the rationales for each of the potential
therapies, and come up with a list of tests to help them better prioritize these.
One of his doctors told him that there
was hope that his cancer, and others like it, would soon
be considered a manageable chronic disease, which could be kept at bay until the patient died of
something else. “I’m either going to be one of the first to be able to outrun a cancer like this, or I’
m going to be one of the last to die from it,” Jobs told me right after one of the meetings with his
doctors. “Either among the first to make it to shore, or the last to get dumped.”
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: