1. Current Trends
37
previous year (see Table 1-7). The countries placed
higher scored between 76.7 (Israel) and 84.8 (Singa-
pore), meaning that Austria was only a tenth of a
point off the world’s top 20. The best performers be-
hind Singapore were the USA (83.7) and Hong Kong
(83.1). Leading the European field, meanwhile, were
the Netherlands (82.4), Switzerland (82.3)
and Ger-
many (81.8). Austria’s performance in a number of
individual indicators has been particularly impres-
sive. In the “Macroeconomic stability” sub-index, for
instance, it achieved the highest score (100 out of
100) and thus claimed first place. The country also
enjoys a very good position in the areas of “Infra-
structure” (89, 10th) and “Innovation capability” (74,
14th). Other areas, however, require significant im-
provement, such as “ICT adoption” – comprising the
sub-indices “Mobile-cellular
telephone subscriptions
per 100 population”, “Mobile-broadband subscrip-
tions per 100 population”, “Fixed-broadband internet
subscriptions per 100 population”, “Fibre internet
subscriptions per 100 population”, and “Internet us-
ers as a percentage of the adult population” – in
which Austria is placed 50th in an international com-
parison. The government has responded to this medi-
ocre performance in key areas of digitalisation with
appropriate measures, including defining a “Digital
Roadmap” and launching the “Broadband Austria
2020” initiative.
The Global Innovation Index (GII) reflects coun-
tries’ innovation capability.
Updated annually, this
overview comprises indicators such as infrastructure,
market and entrepreneurial development, knowledge
and technology output, and creativity output. Austria
retained 21st place between 2018 and 2019 with only
a minimal change to its overall score (51.32 in 2018;
50.94 in 2019) (see Table 1-7). Leading the field are
Switzerland (67.24), Sweden (63.65) and – up from
sixth place – the USA (61.73).
The Netherlands
dropped out of the top three, falling from second in
2018 to fourth in 2019 (61.44). In terms of the individ-
ual indicators, Austria’s performance in this index
was very strong in the area of “Tertiary Education”
33 See Federal Chancellery (BKA) et al. (2011).
(3rd), “Research & Development (R&D)” (18th) and
“Knowledge Workers” (17th). The country also came
25th in the two lower-level sub-indicators of knowl-
edge and technology
output and creativity output,
putting it on the fringes of the leading group of coun-
tries. Austria’s performance was much poorer in the
areas of “Investment” and “Knowledge Diffusion” –
which are based on information on market capitalisa-
tion, on venture capital finance and exports of ICT
services and on foreign direct investment – as it
came in 81st and 40th respectively in an internation-
al comparison.
The European Innovation Scoreboard (EIS) is a way
to analyse and compare the research and innovation
performance of the EU-28
countries and selected
non-member states based on 27 input and output in-
dicators. Austria climbed from tenth to ninth be-
tween 2017 and 2018 and retained its membership of
the group of “Strong Innovators” together with (in
order of ranking) Luxembourg, Belgium, the UK, Ger-
many, Ireland, France and Estonia (see Table 1-7). The
EIS classifies the best performers as “Innovation
Leaders”, a group that comprises Sweden, Finland,
Denmark and the Netherlands. Luxembourg and the
UK dropped out of this group in 2018, having been
members in the previous year.
Austria’s innovation
performance has improved
since 2011 according to the EIS (from 113 points to
125 points in 2018). In terms of individual dimensions
of innovation, Austria’s strongest area at present is
“Linkages”, where it is in first place ahead of Belgium.
This sub-index includes collaboration between inno-
vative SMEs, public-private co-publications and pri-
vate funding to cover R&D expenditure by the public
and higher education sectors. Austria’s
eighth place
in the “intellectual assets” sub-index (patent and
trade mark applications plus uses of designs) and the
“life-long learning” (all the learning and educational
activities of 25- to 64-year-olds) sub-index suggests
that key targets in the federal government’s RTI
strategy
33
for sustainable growth and increased effi-
ciency are being met. In other areas, however, Austria