32
Austrian Research and Technology Report 2020
Fig. 1-12: Breakdown of R&D expenditure by source of funds, 2017*
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
LV
A*
*
HRV
LU
X
PRT
ES
T
ES
P
CY
P
PO
L
GRC
LT
U
RO
U
SV
K
CZ
E
Ø E
U-2
8
FR
A
ITA
HU
N***
NL
D
M
LT
FIN
DE
U***
AU
T
DN
K
SW
E
BG
R
SV
N
IRL
BE
L
CH
E
US
A
CH
N**
/***
EU Member States
Reference countries
in
%
Public sector (excl. higher education institutions)
Business enterprise sector
Higher education sector
Private non-profit sector
Abroad
* Country data not available for the reference year: BGR, CYP, HRV, IRL, MLT, AUS, BRA, ZAF.
** No data available for the reference year in the “Private non-profit sector” category.
*** No data available for the reference year in the “Higher education sector” category.
Source: Eurostat (2020). Graphic: iit.
search intensity is a key political priority,
primarily on
account of the European target for countries to be
spending three percent of their total annual econom-
ic output on R&D by 2020. Whereas the EU as a
whole is missing
this target by some margin, Austria
has hit it consistently since 2014.
Fig. 1-12 shows the make-up of Austria’s R&D ex-
penditure in an international comparison, broken
down into the following sources of funding:
the pub-
lic sector (excluding higher education institutions),
the higher education sector, the business enterprise
sector and the private non-profit sector as well as
funding from abroad. The
various funding percentag-
es by sector are presented as a stacked bar chart,
meaning that the total expenditures for each country
add up to 100% in each case.
Adding together funding from the business enter-
prise sector and abroad
reveals that these two sec-
tors accounted for a total of 68.8% of Austria’s fund-
24 Ibid.
ing in 2017, above the EU-28 average. In terms of the
country’s RTI strategy, this figure is in line with or
higher than the target level
of obtaining two thirds
of funding from the private sector.
24
However, fund-
ing from the Austrian business enterprise sector – i.e.
excluding funding from abroad – stands at 55% and
is thus below the target set in the RTI strategy. Nev-
ertheless, it must be borne in mind in this regard
that, in particular, a few research-intensive compa-
nies in Austria are subsidiaries
of multinational cor-
porations and that their research is funded on an in-
tragroup basis via international payment flows. The
very fact that significant funding flows into Austrian
(companies’) research from abroad thus demon-
strates the country’s performance
capacity as a cen-
tre for research. Something else to consider is the
fact that tax incentives for research are now classi-
fied as funds of the entity engaging in R&D – i.e.
mostly the companies – due to new rules in the sur-