Attorney General V Blake House of Lords

Attorney General v Blake, [2001] 1 A.C. 268 (2000)
© 2023 Thomson Reuters.
3
• Gouriet v Union of Post Office Workers [1978]
AC 435; [1977] 3 WLR 300; [1977] 3 All ER 70,
HL(E)
• Halifax Building Society v Thomas [1996] Ch
217; [1996] 2 WLR 63; [1995] 4 All ER 673, CA
• Hogg v Kirby (1803) 8 Ves 215
• Jaggard v Sawyer [1995] 1 WLR 269; [1995] 2
All ER 189, CA
• Jegon v Vivian (1871) LR 6 ChApp 742
• Johnson v Agnew [1980] AC 367; [1979] 2
WLR 487; [1979] 1 All ER 883, HL(E)
• Lake v Bayliss [1974] 1 WLR 1073; [1974] 2
All ER 1114
• Lamine v Dorrell (1705) 2 LdRaym 1216
• Leeds Industrial Co-operative Society Ltd v
Slack [1924] AC 851, HL(E)
• Lever v Goodwin (1887) 36 ChD 1, CA
• Livingstone v Rawyards Coal Co (1880) 5
AppCas 25, HL(Sc)
• Malone v Metropolitan Police Comr [1980] QB
49; [1978] 3 WLR 936; [1979] 1 All ER 256, CA
• Martin v Porter (1839) 5 M &; W 351
• Mediana, The [1900] AC 113, HL(E)
• Ministry of Defence v Ashman [1993] 2 EGLR
102, CA
• Ministry of Defence v Thompson [1993] 2
EGLR 107, CA
• Occidental Worldwide Investment Corpn v
Skibs A/S Avanti [1976] 1 Lloyd's Rep 293
• Penarth Dock Engineering Co Ltd v Pounds
[1963] 1 Lloyd's Rep 359
• Photo Production Ltd v Securicor Transport Ltd
[1980] AC 827; [1980] 2 WLR 283; [1980] 1 All
ER 556 , HL(E)
• Reading v Attorney General [1951] AC 507;
[1951] 1 All ER 617 , HL(E)
• Reid-Newfoundland Co v Anglo-American
Telegraph Co Ltd [1912] AC 555 , PC
• Robinson v Harman (1848) 1 Exch 850
• Ruxley Electronics and Construction Ltd v
Forsyth [1996] AC 344; [1995] 3 WLR 118;
[1995] 3 All ER 268 , HL(E)
• Snepp v United States (1980) 444 US 507
• Strand Electric and Engineering Co Ltd v
Brisford Entertainments Ltd [1952] 2 QB 246;
[1952] 1 All ER 796 , CA
• Surrey County Council v Bredero Homes Ltd
[1993] 1 WLR 1361 ; [1992] 3 All ER 302, CA
• Tito v Waddell (No 2) [1977] Ch 106; [1977] 2
WLR 496; [1977] 3 All ER 129 ; (Note) [1977]
3 WLR 972
• Todd v Gee (1810) 17 Ves 273
• United Australia Ltd v Barclays Bank Ltd
[1941] AC 1; [1940] 4 All ER 20 , HL(E)
• Watson, Laidlaw & Co Ltd v Pott, Cassels and
Williamson (1914) 31 RPC 104 , HL(Sc)
• Webb v Chief Constable of Merseyside Police
[2000] QB 427; [2000] 2 WLR 546; [2000] 1 All
ER 209
• White v Jones [1995] 2 AC 207; [1995] 2 WLR
187; [1995] 1 All ER 691, HL(E)
• Whitwham v Westminster Brymbo Coal and
Coke Co [1896] 2 Ch 538, CA
• Wrotham Park Estate Co Ltd v Parkside Homes
Ltd [1974] 1 WLR 798; [1974] 2 All ER 321
The following additional cases were cited in argument:
• Attorney General v Guardian Newspapers Ltd
(No 2) [1990] 1 AC 109; [1988] 3 WLR 776;
[1988] 3 All ER 545, HL(E)
• Chic Fashions (West Wales) Ltd v Jones [1968]
2 QB 299; [1968] 2 WLR 201; [1968] 1 All ER
229, CA
• Chief Constable of Hampshire v A Ltd [1985]
QB 132; [1984] 2 WLR 954; [1984] 2 All ER 385,
CA
• Chief Constable of Leicestershire v M [1989] 1
WLR 20; [1988] 3 All ER 1015
• Incal v Turkey (1998) 4 BHRC 476
• Lawless v Ireland (No 2) (1961) 1 EHRR 13
• Observer, The, and The Guardian v United
Kingdom (1991) 14 EHRR 153
• P v Liverpool Daily Post and Echo Newspapers
plc [1991] 2 AC 370; [1991] 2 WLR 513; [1991]
1 All ER 622, HL(E)
• Portsmouth City Council v Richards and
Quietlynn Ltd [1989] 1 CMLR 673, CA
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department,
Ex p Simms [2000] 2 AC 115; [1999] 3 WLR 328;
[1999] 3 All ER 400, HL(E)
• Stoke-on-Trent City Council v B & Q (Retail)
Ltd [1984] AC 754; [1984] 2 WLR 929; [1984] 2
All ER 332, HL(E)

---