Andijan state medical institute department of pharmaceutical sciences

Criteria for assessing and monitoring students' knowledge of science

Grading methods	Express tests, written works, oral questions, pedagogical technologies
Grading criteria	5 ratings “excellent” - be able to fully master the theoretical and methodological concepts of science; - be able to think creatively in solving situational issues on the topic; - Conclusions and decisions on laboratory work; - independent observation; - to be able to apply the theoretical knowledge on the subject; - to fully understand the essence of the studied topic; - to know, describe and imagine the chemical-toxicological examination.
	4 ratings “good” - Independent observation on the subject; - be able to accurately reflect the results of the analysis; - understand the essence of the topic; - to have an idea of the practical nature of the studied topic; - to be able to apply theoretical knowledge in science; - independent decision making.
	3 rating "satisfactory" - to understand the essence of the studied topic; - have an idea of the laboratory work; - to know and be able to tell the theoretical knowledge of the subject.
	2 ratings “unsatisfactory” - Lack of knowledge of the theoretical and methodological foundations of the science; - Lack of a clear idea of the practical nature of the subject; - Inability to apply theoretical knowledge in practice.