Measurement for assessing the effectiveness of Internet marketing can be thought of as
Are corporate objectives identified in the Internet marketing strategy being met?
Are marketing objectives defined in the Internet marketing strategy and plan achieved?
624
Part 3 Implementation
3
Are marketing communications objectives identified in the Internet marketing plan
achieved?
4
How efficient are the different promotional techniques used to attract visitors to a site?
Efficiency measures are more concerned with minimising the costs of online marketing
while maximising the returns for different areas of focus such as acquiring visitors to a web-
site, converting visitors to outcome or achieving repeat business.
Chaffey (2000) suggests that organisations define a measurement framework which
defines groupings of specific metrics used to assess Internet marketing performance. He sug-
gests that suitable measurement frameworks will fulfil these criteria:
A
Include both macro- level effectiveness metrics which assess whether strategic goals are
achieved and indicate to what extent e-marketing contributes to the business (revenue
contribution and return on investment).
B
Include micro- level metrics which assess the efficiency of e-marketing tactics and imple-
mentation. Wisner and Fawcett (1991) note that typically organisations use a hierarchy
of measures and they should check that the lower- level measures support the macro-
level strategic objectives. Such measures are often referred to as performance drivers,
since achieving targets for these measures will assist in achieving strategic objectives.
E-marketing performance drivers help optimise e-marketing by attracting more site visi-
tors and increasing conversion to desired marketing outcomes.
C
Assess the impact of the e-marketing on the satisfaction, loyalty and contribution of key
stakeholders (customers, investors, employees and partners) as suggested by Adams et al.
(2000).
D
The framework must be flexible enough to be applied to different forms of online pres-
ence whether business-to-consumer, business-to-business, not- for- profit or transactional
e-tail, CRM- orientated or brand- building. Adams et al. (2000) note that a ‘ one- size- fits-
all’ framework is not desirable.
E
Enable comparison of performance of different e-channels with other channels as sug-
gested by Friedman and Furey (1999).
F
The framework can be used to assess e-marketing performance against competitors’ or
out-of-sector best practice.
When identifying metrics it is common practice to apply the widely used SMART mnemonic
and it is also useful to consider three levels – business measures, marketing measures and
specific Internet marketing measures (see objective setting section in Chapter 5).
Chaffey (2000) presented a framework of measures, shown in Figure 12.7, which can be
applied to a range of different companies. Metrics for the categories are generated as objec-
tives from Internet marketing planning which then need to be monitored to assess the suc-
cess of strategy and its implementation. Objectives can be devised in a top- down fashion,
starting with strategic objectives for business contribution and marketing outcomes leading
to tactical objectives for customer satisfaction, behaviour and site promotion. An alterna-
tive perspective is bottom-up – success in achieving objectives for site promotion, on-site
customer behaviour and customer satisfaction lead sequentially to achieving objectives for
marketing outcomes and business contribution.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: